ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07851376

Multi-Modal Digital Monitoring of Disease Symptoms in Spinocerebellar Ataxia

Record copied from ClinicalTrials.gov: Oct 10, 2026AI summaries generated: Oct 10, 2026

Multi-Modal Digital Monitoring of Disease Symptoms in Spinocerebellar Ataxia

StatusNot yet recruitingThe study has been registered but has not started enrolling. Sites and contacts may not be listed yet.
Study typeObservationalA study in which researchers do not assign participants to a treatment or other intervention. They observe or measure what happens, which may include study visits, tests, questionnaires or a review of medical records.
Age18 years old to 75 years old
SexAll
LocationUnited States
AI summaryWhat this study is about, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴

AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.

This observational study will evaluate multi‑modal digital monitoring in people with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA types 1, 2, 3, or 6). About 25 participants will be followed for roughly 12 months with clinic visits at screening/baseline and on Day 1, 30, 90, 180, and 360. Participants will wear sensors at home for seven days after visits and complete tablet-based speech and oculomotor tests alongside standard clinical ataxia assessments.

What it is studying. Whether a combined set of digital measures (wearable sensors, speech recordings, psychomotor tests, and tablet-based eye-movement tests) can feasibly and repeatedly capture SCA symptoms and how those digital measures relate to established clinical and patient-reported assessments such as the SARA and EQ-5D-5L.

What the researchers hope to learn. To evaluate the feasibility of using a multi‑modal digital monitoring platform in SCA; to characterize how digital measures (steps, stride velocity, goal-directed movements, speech intelligibility, oculomotor metrics) relate to clinical scales and patient-reported outcomes; and to support identification of objective digital endpoints for future SCA research.

What this study is about

The study's own summary, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov. Underlined terms have a short explanation.

This is an observational study. Subjects with a documented diagnosis of spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) will be screened and recruited to participate at two clinical sites: Johns Hopkins University (JHU) and Columbia University (CU). Researchers at BioSensics, JHU, and CU will use wearable sensors computerized speech, psychomotor, and ocular assessments to evaluate the feasibility of using digital health technologies to monitor symptoms in SCA. Researchers will also measure the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and other SCA clinical assessments. The solution will be deployed for 25 participants with SCA for approximately 12 months with 5 study visits (Screening/Baseline, Day 1, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 360).

Eligibility

The criteria exactly as listed on ClinicalTrials.gov. Only the study team can say whether they apply to you.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female, aged 18-75 years
  • Fluent in English (able to speak and read)
  • Able to ambulate at least 10 meters independently or with a cane, without other assistive devices, as determined by the investigator
  • Able to independently perform all study activities safely, as determined by the investigator
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent and comply with all study procedures
  • Genetically or clinically confirmed diagnosis of spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA 1, 2, 3, or 6)

Exclusion criteria

  • Individuals who are unable to ambulate at least 10 meters independently or with a cane.
  • Individuals with a neurological, medical, or psychiatric condition (other than SCA) that, in the investigator's judgment, would interfere with safe participation in study activities or confound the assessment of ataxia
  • Pregnant individuals, due to potential changes in gait and physical activity during pregnancy
  • Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would prevent the participant from completing the study procedures safely

Study description and what participation involves

The study's detailed description, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Show the detailed description from the registry

The spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of rare, autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorders characterized by progressive degeneration of the cerebellum and its connecting pathways. The four most common subtypes (SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, and SCA6) are caused by expanded polyglutamine-coding CAG repeats, and collectively account for the majority of dominantly inherited ataxias worldwide. The cardinal feature across subtypes is progressive ataxia affecting gait, stance, limb coordination, and speech, frequently accompanied by oculomotor abnormalities and, in some subtypes, extracerebellar signs such as spasticity, peripheral neuropathy, and parkinsonism. Symptoms typically begin in adulthood and progress over many years, leading to severe disability and reduced life expectancy. The principal means of measuring ataxia severity is the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), which is the most widely applied clinical outcome assessment (COA) for genetic ataxias and has been used as the primary endpoint in large natural history cohorts and randomized controlled trials. Although the SARA has demonstrated good inter-rater reliability and has been validated across multiple SCA subtypes, it is inherently subjective and semi-quantitative, requires trained personnel to administer, and may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect incremental but clinically meaningful changes over short follow-up intervals. Movement-associated symptoms are a core feature of SCA and have a substantial negative impact on quality of life. Impairments in gait and balance contribute to falls and loss of independence, while dysarthria and impaired limb coordination affect communication and activities of daily living. Because these assessments are conducted infrequently, typically in a clinic setting, they may not accurately represent an individual's true functional status during everyday life. However, the increasing understanding of disease pathomechanisms and the development of gene-targeting and other novel therapeutic approaches have raised expectations for disease-modifying treatments. The key challenge in developing new therapeutics for SCA and other neurological disorders is that current disease assessment is largely subjective and requires in-person, in-clinic evaluation. Digital measures, such as those proposed in this study, can provide objective, sensitive, and real-world assessments of how individuals are functioning. A growing body of evidence demonstrates that digital biomarkers derived from body-worn inertial sensors can quantify ataxia-specific gait and balance impairments, and correlate strongly with clinician-rated SARA scores. Beyond gait and balance, multi-modal digital assessment of speech, hand function, and oculomotor control may capture complementary domains of cerebellar dysfunction that are affected in SCA. Acoustic analysis of speech can quantify dysarthria, finger tapping can characterize upper-limb bradykinesia and dysrhythmia, and oculomotor testing can capture saccadic and antisaccadic abnormalities that are characteristic of cerebellar disease. Thus, a system that can objectively, sensitively, and frequently monitor multiple clinical domains (motor, speech, and oculomotor function) is necessary to understand the pattern of evolving impairment in individuals with SCA and to support the identification of endpoint measures for therapeutic trials. This study will evaluate the feasibility of a multi-modal digital monitoring platform in a cohort of individuals with SCA and will characterize the relationship between digital measures and established clinical and patient reported outcomes.

AI summaryWhat participation may involve, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴

AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.

Participation lasts about 12 months with several in-clinic visits (the record lists Screening/Baseline, Day 1, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, and Day 360). At clinic visits participants will complete clinical ataxia assessments including the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), walk and mobility tests (1-Minute Walk, Timed Up and Go, 30-second Chair Sit-to-Stand), and quality-of-life questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS). Participants will perform tablet-based speech and oculomotor (eye-movement) tests that are video-recorded and will wear PAMSys sensors (pendant, ULM wrist sensors, and PAMSys Gait) for seven days at home after each clinical visit (LEGSys sensors are used during the clinic walking tests) to record steps, upper-limb movements, stride velocity, and related digital measures. Sensor data, videos, and clinic test results will be analyzed to compare digital measures with standard clinical assessments.

How the study is structured. This is a prospective observational cohort study. Participants attend clinic visits at screening/baseline and at several time points over about 12 months, and after each visit they will be asked to wear specified wearable sensors at home for seven days. At clinic visits participants complete clinical ataxia scales (including SARA), a 1-minute walk and other mobility tests, tablet-based speech recordings (Rainbow Passage) and oculomotor (saccade) video assessments, and quality-of-life questionnaires. No experimental treatment is assigned; the study collects repeated digital and clinical measurements to compare and characterize them.

Questions you could ask

These questions are suggestions for a conversation with the study team or your own clinician, not advice.

  • This is an observational study, so the study itself gives no treatment. What would taking part involve for me, and would it change my usual care?
  • The registry says recruitment has not started. When is it expected to open, and can I register interest now?
  • The listed sites are in United States. Is any of them reachable for me, and does the study help with travel?
  • Which of the eligibility criteria would need to be checked with tests before I could join?

More on spinocerebellar ataxia

Important dates

Study start
Dec 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Study completion
Jan 31, 2029 (estimated)
Target enrollment
25 participants (estimated)
Last updated on registry
Oct 1, 2026
Data verified
Oct 10, 2026

Sponsor and research team

The lead sponsor funds and oversees the trial. A pharmaceutical or biotech company sponsor typically means the study is testing that company's drug or device; a hospital, university, or government agency usually indicates investigator-initiated or publicly funded research.

Lead sponsor
BioSensics

Central study contact

If you're interested in participating, the central contact can answer general questions about the study — including eligibility requirements and how to find a recruiting site near you. Actual eligibility is determined by the site's medical team.

Participating sites (2)

  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

    Lutherville, Maryland, 21093 · United States

  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center/Neurological Institute of New York

    New York, New York, 10032 · United States

Terms used on this page · explanations by MedicalUpdates.ai

Baseline
Measurements taken at the start of the study, before any study treatment, so that later results can be compared with them.
informed consent
The process of explaining a study, including its risks and what participation involves, so that a person can decide freely whether to take part. Consent is usually documented in writing, and a participant can choose to leave the study later.
Inclusion Criteria
The conditions a person must meet to be considered for the study, for example a confirmed diagnosis, an age range or a test result.
Exclusion Criteria
The conditions that rule a person out even if they meet the inclusion criteria, for example other illnesses, certain medicines or pregnancy.
life expectancy
Some studies require that, in the investigator's judgement, a participant is likely to live long enough to complete the study period. It is a study requirement, not a prediction about any individual.
primary endpoint
The main result the study is designed to measure and report on. Other results, called secondary outcomes, are also collected.
natural history
A study that follows how a condition changes over time without assigning an experimental treatment. It may involve study visits and tests, and is often used to plan future trials.
randomized
Participants are assigned to the study groups by chance, like a coin toss, rather than chosen by the doctor or the participant. This is done so the groups are comparable.
follow-up
The period after treatment or enrolment during which participants are observed or contacted, for example to record side effects or outcomes.
biomarkers
Something measurable in the body, such as a blood test result or an imaging finding, that indicates how a condition or treatment is behaving.
endpoint
Something the study measures to judge its results, such as a symptom score, a blood test or survival. Outcomes are grouped as primary, secondary and sometimes exploratory.
cohort
A group of people who share a characteristic, such as a diagnosis, and are studied together. 'Prospective' means they are followed forward from enrolment; 'retrospective' means existing records are reviewed.

The study record on this page is reproduced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, where it was submitted by the study sponsor. MedicalUpdates.ai does not own this content, is not affiliated with or endorsed by ClinicalTrials.gov, NIH, or the U.S. Government, and does not verify the record. Plain-language notes, the glossary and the questions above are added by this site; text in the boxes marked "AI summary" was written by an AI model and may contain errors. Registry records change over time. Check the original record for the current version and discuss eligibility or participation with a qualified healthcare professional.

← Back to clinical trials