ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03660917

Riluzole in Patients With Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7

Record copied from ClinicalTrials.gov: Oct 10, 2026AI summaries generated: Sep 17, 2026

Riluzole in Patients With Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7: a Randomized , Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Pilot Trial With a Lead in Phase

StatusRecruitingThe study is currently enrolling participants. Only the study team can say whether a particular person can join.
Study typeInterventionalA study in which researchers assign participants to one or more interventions, such as a drug, procedure, device, behavioural programme or other approach, to measure their effects.
PhasePhase 2/3A study that tests whether a treatment works while continuing to check safety, in a larger group than a phase 2 study alone. It combines the aims of phase 2 and phase 3 in one protocol.
Age7 years old and older
SexAll
LocationItaly
AI summaryWhat this study is about, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴

AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.

A randomized, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled pilot trial testing oral riluzole in people with genetically confirmed SCA7 (minimum age 7 years). All participants have a 6‑month run‑in with assessments, then are randomized 1:1 to either 12 months of riluzole or 6 months placebo followed by 6 months riluzole, with follow‑up through 18 months. Main outcomes are visual acuity and stability of the SARA at 18 months.

What it is studying. The study tests whether taking oral riluzole affects vision (visual acuity and other eye tests) and ataxia severity (SARA score) in people with SCA7, and collects safety data over 18 months.

What the researchers hope to learn. To learn whether riluzole stabilizes visual acuity and SARA ataxia scores in SCA7; to measure ophthalmologic outcomes and safety biomarkers; to inform future research and trial design.

What this study is about

The study's own summary, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov. Underlined terms have a short explanation.

Spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7) belongs to the dominant forms of inherited cerebellar ataxias (CA), being one of the rarest form. SCA7 has no therapeutic options, so that the relentless course, the important visual deficit that accompanies CA, and the possibility of disease development in childhood are pressing unmet needs. The investigators published encouraging data on riluzole in inherited CA other than SCA7. These results prompted off-label use of riluzole in single cases of SCA7 in Italy and United States, suggesting possible efficacy of the drug in this condition.

Interventions being studied

Being studied in this trial does not mean the treatment or procedure is approved or available for this condition.

Drug
  • Riluzole
  • Placebo

Eligibility

The criteria exactly as listed on ClinicalTrials.gov. Only the study team can say whether they apply to you.

Inclusion criteria

  • positive genetic test for SCA7.

Exclusion criteria

  • cardiac arrhythmias;
  • haematologic diseases;
  • hepatic diseases with serum values of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase or bilirubin > 1·5 times above normal limit;
  • pregnancy (women of childbearing potential agreed to use contraception);
  • breastfeeding.

Study description and what participation involves

The study's detailed description, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Show the detailed description from the registry

The investigators propose a clinical trial in SCA7 patients performing a serial evaluation of riluzole effects on stringent outcome measures: ophthalmological metrics, scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) scores, and safety biomarkers. The study design will be a randomized , double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial with a lead-in phase. The design will include a run-in phase of 6 months for all the participants, assessing ophthalmological metrics and SARA scores at the month 0, 3, and 6. Then one arm will undergo riluzole for other 12 months, while the other will take placebo for 6 months, and riluzole for the following 6 months; from both groups the same evaluations will be obtained at the month 12, 15 and 18 of the study. Thirty-four patients will be enrolled at 4 clinical Centers (3 in Italy and one in U.S.). The clinical epidemiology aspects (design of the study, statistical analysis and enrollment process) will be followed by National Rare Diseases Centre and Complex Diseases Group of National Centre of Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion of National Institute of Health. Eligible subjects for this study are patients (at least 7-year old) with positive genetic test for SCA7. Serious systemic illnesses or conditions (cardiac, haematologic and hepatic diseases) known for enhancing the side effects of riluzole, pregnancy or breastfeeding will be exclusion criteria. Participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to riluzole (50 mg twice daily) or placebo. In pre-pubertal subjects the dosage will be adjusted on a mg/m2 basis according to the recommended human daily dose (100 mg). At baseline and after 3, 6, 12, 15 and 18 months, symptoms, physical and neurological signs, and SARA score will be recorded. At the same time points the following quantitative ophthalmologic assessments will be performed:

  • corrected visual acuity (right eye and left eye measurements) expressed as logMAR units with the ETDRS chart (either back-illuminated or projected).
  • Color vision via a Farnsworth D15 Arrangement Test.
  • Visual evoked potential are elicited using transient Pattern Reversal stimuli and monocular stimulation.
  • Electroretinography
  • Optical Coherence tomography with macular map of both eyes.
  • Computerized visual field examination by standard automated perimetry and kinetic perimetry Every three months electrocardiogram and a laboratory profile will be obtained for drug safety.

The co-primary endpoints will be the proportion of patients with stability of SARA score and visual acuity (in log MAR units) at 18 months, compared to the mean values of t0-t3-t6 evaluations. A sample size of 17 patients per group (a total of 34 patients) had 80% power and an α value of 10% to detect a difference between the two groups of 35% in the co-primary end points. This calculation took into account published data on riluzole in CA. Data will be expressed as mean (SD) for continuous variables and as proportions for categorical variables. Comparisons between riluzole and placebo group will be assessed using the t test for unpaired data for continuous variables and odds ratio with a relative 95% CI for categorical data. An intention-to-treat analysis will be done adopting a last observation carried forward method. A logistic regression model will be done at 18 months to adjust the results for the main baseline characteristics; p values less than 0.05 will be considered significant.

AI summaryWhat participation may involve, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴

AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.

After a 6‑month run-in with exams at 0, 3 and 6 months, participants are randomly assigned 1:1 to take oral riluzole (50 mg twice daily; children pre‑pubertal have a dose adjusted by body surface area) for 12 months or to take placebo for 6 months followed by riluzole for 6 months. Visits with neurological exam and SARA (Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia) scoring and detailed eye testing occur at baseline and at months 3, 6, 12, 15 and 18; eye tests include corrected visual acuity (ETDRS), Farnsworth D15 color testing, visual evoked potentials, electroretinography, optical coherence tomography, and visual field testing. ECG and laboratory safety tests are done every three months. Participants will take the study drug orally and follow the scheduled clinic visits and testing; assignment is randomized and double‑blind during the controlled phase.

How the study is structured. Interventional drug trial. After a 6‑month observational run‑in (assessments at 0, 3, 6 months), participants are randomized 1:1 in a double‑blind, parallel design. One group receives riluzole 50 mg twice daily for 12 months; the other receives placebo for 6 months then riluzole for 6 months. Eye exams, neurologic exams including SARA scoring, ECGs and lab safety checks occur at scheduled visits through month 18.

Questions you could ask

These questions are suggestions for a conversation with the study team or your own clinician, not advice.

  • The registry lists this study under SCA7. Does it apply to my diagnosis?
  • Some participants receive a placebo. How is that decided, and what happens for placebo-group participants when the study ends?
  • The listed sites are in Italy. Is any of them reachable for me, and does the study help with travel?
  • Which of the eligibility criteria would need to be checked with tests before I could join?

More on spinocerebellar ataxia

Important dates

Study start
Jun 1, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2025 (estimated)
Study completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Target enrollment
34 participants (estimated)
Last updated on registry
Dec 2, 2024
Data verified
Oct 10, 2026

Sponsor and research team

The lead sponsor funds and oversees the trial. A pharmaceutical or biotech company sponsor typically means the study is testing that company's drug or device; a hospital, university, or government agency usually indicates investigator-initiated or publicly funded research.

Lead sponsor
S. Andrea Hospital
Principal investigator
Giovanni Ristori, Principal Investigator
S. Andrea Hospital

Central study contact

If you're interested in participating, the central contact can answer general questions about the study — including eligibility requirements and how to find a recruiting site near you. Actual eligibility is determined by the site's medical team.

Participating sites (1)

Terms used on this page · explanations by MedicalUpdates.ai

women of childbearing potential
Studies often ask participants who could become pregnant, or could father a child, to use contraception during the study and for a period afterwards, because the effect of the treatment on a pregnancy is unknown.
Inclusion Criteria
The conditions a person must meet to be considered for the study, for example a confirmed diagnosis, an age range or a test result.
Exclusion Criteria
The conditions that rule a person out even if they meet the inclusion criteria, for example other illnesses, certain medicines or pregnancy.
outcome measures
Something the study measures to judge its results, such as a symptom score, a blood test or survival. Outcomes are grouped as primary, secondary and sometimes exploratory.
biomarkers
Something measurable in the body, such as a blood test result or an imaging finding, that indicates how a condition or treatment is behaving.
randomized
Participants are assigned to the study groups by chance, like a coin toss, rather than chosen by the doctor or the participant. This is done so the groups are comparable.
double-blind
Two types of people involved in the study do not know which intervention a participant is receiving. The ClinicalTrials.gov record specifies who is masked, for example participants, care providers, investigators or outcome assessors.
placebo-controlled
A study design in which one group receives a placebo so that the study treatment's effects can be compared with no active treatment.
run-in
A period at the start of a study, before the study treatment begins, used for example to confirm that participants meet the criteria or to record their usual symptoms.
placebo
A treatment that looks like the study treatment but contains no active ingredient. Some participants receive it instead of the study treatment, usually without knowing which they got.
enrollment
The number of participants a study plans to include, or has included. 'Estimated' means the planned number; 'actual' means the number who joined.
1:1
How many participants go to each group. In a 2:1 ratio, two are assigned to the first group for every one assigned to the second.
baseline
Measurements taken at the start of the study, before any study treatment, so that later results can be compared with them.
electrocardiogram
A recording of the heart's electrical activity. QTc is one measurement from it; some drugs are avoided if it is prolonged.

The study record on this page is reproduced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, where it was submitted by the study sponsor. MedicalUpdates.ai does not own this content, is not affiliated with or endorsed by ClinicalTrials.gov, NIH, or the U.S. Government, and does not verify the record. Plain-language notes, the glossary and the questions above are added by this site; text in the boxes marked "AI summary" was written by an AI model and may contain errors. Registry records change over time. Check the original record for the current version and discuss eligibility or participation with a qualified healthcare professional.

← Back to clinical trials