Robotically Assisted Surgery For Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Prospective Study

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents the most common biliary tract malignancy, and the second most common primary hepatic malignancy, accounting for 15% to 20% of primary liver tumours. The incidence of bile duct cancers is increasing worldwide, currently accounting for 3% of all gastrointestinal cancers (1). According to the anatomical location it is classified as follows: intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) subtypes. Approximately 50% of CCA are perihilar, 40% are extrahepatic and only 10% or less are intrahepatic (2). Each type of cholangiocarcinoma is characterised by differences in the tumour biology and management, each has a separate American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (2). Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), also called Klatskin tumour, involves the biliary confluence with or without involvement of the right and left hepatic ducts (3, 4, 5). It is a challenging disease to manage in the preoperatory setting and during surgery. Painless jaundice is the main symptom at presentation. It often arises rapidly and it is present in 90% of pCCA. Fatigue, anorexia, weight loss and non-specific abdominal pain are other common symptoms. Complete resection with negative histologic margins is the only chance of cure and the most robust predictor of long-term survival for patients affected by any type of locally advanced CCA. However, the proximity of perihilar tumors to vital structures, such as the hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic parenchyma, makes curative excision technically difficult. Median survival for patients who cannot undergo surgery is 12 months. Patients who receive radical surgical resection have a 5-year survival up to 40% (6, 7). Radical surgical resection of pCCA usually requires a hemi-hepatectomy, often extended. For this reason, the preoperative assessment of the future liver remnant volume (FLR) is a critical step in the surgical plan. Traditionally, a "safe" liver resection requires a FLR of at least 25% in a perfectly healthy liver. When the organ is compromised by steatosis, chronic cholestasis, cirrhosis or chemotherapy this rate has to increase up to 40% (8, 9). Regional lymphnode metastases are not considered an absolute contraindication?contraindication A reason a particular test or treatment should not be used for a person, for example a metal implant that rules out an MRI scan. to resection, although N+ disease is an independent prognostic factor for worse outcome. Nevertheless, complete lymphadenectomy of the hepatoduodenal ligament is considered an essential step of the surgical procedure. Liver and bile duct resection for pCCA are technically complex procedures: the specimen resection with negative margins requires careful dissection of major vascular structures such as portal vein and hepatic arteries. Once completed the resection the biliary tract must be reconstructed, usually with a Jejunal loop. This step of the procedure is particularly complex and requires high levels of skills and detail, thus, so far, has widely limited the use of laparoscopic surgery to complete the surgical procedure. As previously in other fields of surgery, minimally invasive approaches are progressively spreading in liver surgery units worldwide. Significant advantages of minimally invasive liver resections, if compared to open one, have been diffusely shown. In particular, lower morbidity and shorter hospital stays have been demonstrated in many numerically relevant series. Interestingly enough, greater advantages compared to open surgery have been shown in cases of "laparoscopically difficult" liver resections as right or left hepatectomy. Robot-assisted liver surgery represents a natural consequence of such a minimally invasive evolution. Potential advantages of Robot assisted approach are "intuitive". In particular, in liver surgery the relationship between instrument angle of incidence and plans of action occurs in spatially complex and extremely variable scenarios. More than in other surgical settings, such an articulated spatial interaction needs flexible and harmonic movements warranted in robot assisted interventions. Recent evidence confirms Robot assisted hepatectomies are associated with less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay if compared to open liver resections. At the same time, both minor and major Robot assisted hepatectomies showed similar oncologic performance, morbidity and mortality profile than open liver resections (10, 11). The key advantage of robotic assistance is to allow complex reconstructive procedures similar to those performed in open surgery (12). The relevant developments already achieved in the field of pancreatic surgery (13) are paradigmatic with relevant future perspectives. Indeed, the Whipple reconstruction phase is now performed in many leading robotic assisted HPB centres. It is easy to predict that in hepatobiliary surgery as well the next steps of development will include major vasculo-biliary reconstructions. AIM OF THE STUDY The aim of the study is investigating the potential advantage of Robotic major liver surgery with biliary reconstruction for pCCA utilising a robotic platform, such as the DaVinci® robotic platform, currently available at the Padova teaching hospital and in use for the HPB service. OUTCOMES Primary Outcomes Morbidity: Defined as major and minor complication rate according to Dindo-Clavien classification (14) and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), including ninety-days mortality Secondary Outcomes

• Conversion rate
• Margin status (R0 Vs R1)
• Biliary Fistula: As defined by International Study Group?Study Group One of the groups in a study. Each arm receives a particular intervention, comparator or no intervention, so the groups can be compared. of Liver Surgery (15)
• Liver failure: As defined by International Study Group of Liver Surgery (16)
• Disease specific survival
• Overall Survival (1-3-5 years)

STUDY POPULATION AND METHODS This is a prospective observational study. All patients affected by pCCA that will undergo curative intent surgery that requires biliary reconstruction will be enrolled in the study after the work up for surgery. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data will be collected. The DaVinci® robotic platform available at the Padova University hospital will be utilised primarily. In case of future acquisition of newer or different robotic platforms, those will be utilised as well for the study. The postoperative outcome, morbidity, mortality, pathologic margins, number of lymph nodes collected, and long-term oncologic outcome will be reviewed and compared with the historical cohort?cohort A group of people who share a characteristic, such as a diagnosis, and are studied together. 'Prospective' means they are followed forward from enrolment; 'retrospective' means existing records are reviewed. of the HPB service of Padova University that includes more than 150 cases completed after 2004. INCLUSION CRITERIA?INCLUSION CRITERIA The conditions a person must meet to be considered for the study, for example a confirmed diagnosis, an age range or a test result. Age≥18 years Histologically proven pCCA Highly presumed bile duct malignancy with difficulties to obtain histological evidence with negative Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4 sample) Preoperative staging work up performed by abdomen enhanced CT scan. The subject understands the nature of this trial and is willing to comply. Ability to provide written informed consent. Patients treated with curative intent in accordance to international guidelines EXCLUSION CRITERIA?EXCLUSION CRITERIA The conditions that rule a person out even if they meet the inclusion criteria, for example other illnesses, certain medicines or pregnancy. Distant metastases: peritoneal carcinomatosis, liver metastases, distant lymph node metastases, involvement of other organs. Previous radiotherapy Vascular encasement Patients with high operative risk as defined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score>4. Synchronous malignancy in other organs. Palliative surgery Pathologic Evaluation All surgical specimens will be submitted for histopathological evaluation by adopting a standardised protocol where only dedicated pathologists with expertise in gastro-intestinal pathology will assess the specimens. To adequately determine residual disease status, five resection planes (common bile duct, proximal bile duct, hepatic artery, portal vein, and liver parenchyma) and one periductal dissection plane will be obtained from each surgical specimen. Histological reports will include the following clinicopathological parameters: tumor's size and differentiation grade, vascular, perineural and intraductal invasion, resection/dissection planes status, tumor growth pattern (mass forming, periductal infiltrating, intraductal, and mixed type), lymph node status and coexisting pathology (inflammation, fibrosis, steatosis, sclerosing cholangitis etc.). The annular resection margins (common bile duct, proximal bile duct, hepatic artery, and portal vein) will be recorded as positive or negative, since their slices are generally 1 to 3 mm thick and a "negative" annular plane ensures a margin of > 1 mm. For non-annular planes (periductal and liver parenchyma), margins will be assessed as positive if cancer is up to 1 mm along the dissection plane in the hepatoduodenal ligament or on the liver transection plane. The presence of severe dysplasia or carcinoma in situ at the surgical margin will be classified as a negative margin. The final pathological staging will be generated according to the revised American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM staging system 8th edition (17). Statistical analysis Values for categorical variables will be expressed as totals and percentages whereas for continuous variables they will be expressed as medians and ranges or interquartile ranges. Statistical analyses will be performed using the Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's test for categorical variables such as Liver failure biliary leakage hemorrhage and other complications and the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test for continuous variables, such as length of hospital stay, intensive care length of stay etc. The length of follow-up?follow-up The period after treatment or enrolment during which participants are observed or contacted, for example to record side effects or outcomes. will be calculated from the date of surgery to the date of patient death (overall survival-OS) or the latest follow-up. The durations of follow-up and survival will be expressed as medians (interquartile ranges). Survival and recurrence curves will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique and compared with the log-rank test. A p value < 0.05 will be considered to indicate statistical significance, variables with a p value < 0.1 were considered of marginal statistical significance.