ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05368038
ScreenPlus: A Comprehensive, Flexible, Multi-disorder Newborn Screening Program
ScreenPlus: A Comprehensive, Flexible, Multi-disorder Newborn Screening Program
AI summaryWhat this study is about, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴
AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.
ScreenPlus is a consented pilot newborn screening program offering parents the option to have their newborn tested for a changing panel of rare genetic disorders. The study plans to screen up to 100,000 infants over nine years at designated hospitals and will refer babies with positive screens for confirmatory testing and physician follow-up. It also collects parent surveys and interviews to study ethical, legal, and social questions around expanded newborn screening.
What it is studying. The study is testing the accuracy (analytic and clinical validity) of multi-tiered screening assays for a flexible panel of disorders, measuring disease incidence in a large newborn population, and assessing the impact of earlier diagnosis and parental experiences related to expanded newborn screening.
What the researchers hope to learn. Generate evidence on the validity of screening tests for candidate disorders; estimate how often these disorders occur in newborns; collect data on outcomes after early diagnosis; and study parents' information needs and ethical, legal, and social implications to inform newborn screening policy.
What this study is about
The study's own summary, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov. Underlined terms have a short explanation.
ScreenPlus is a consented, multi-disorder pilot newborn screening program implemented in conjunction with the New York State Newborn Screening Program that provides families the option to have their newborn(s) screened for a panel of additional conditions. The study has three primary objectives: 1) define the analytic and clinical validity of multi-tiered screening assays for a flexible panel of disorders, 2) determine disease incidence in a large newborn population, and 3) assess the impact of early diagnosis on health outcomes. Over a nine-year period, ScreenPlus aims to screen 100,000 infants born in eight high birthrate hospitals in New York for a flexible panel of rare genetic disorders. This study will also evaluate the Ethical, Legal and Social issues pertaining to NBS for complex disorders, which will be done via online surveys that will be directed towards ScreenPlus parents who opt to participate and qualitative interviews with families of infants who are identified through ScreenPlus.
Interventions being studied
Being studied in this trial does not mean the treatment or procedure is approved or available for this condition.
- Diagnostic test
- Confirmatory Testing
Eligibility
The criteria exactly as listed on ClinicalTrials.gov. Only the study team can say whether they apply to you.
Inclusion criteria
- All newborn infants born at a ScreenPlus pilot hospital
- Infants who are less than four weeks old, regardless of sex, gestational age, or health status.
Exclusion criteria
- A newborn screening sample is unavailable
- Infants who are more than four weeks old
Study description and what participation involves
The study's detailed description, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Show the detailed description from the registry
Soon after birth, all babies born in the United States have a newborn screening (NBS) test to check for certain medical conditions. All babies are screened, even if they appear healthy, because most of these conditions have no obvious physical findings in a newborn and might otherwise be diagnosed only after the development of serious problems, such as brain damage, organ damage, or death. In fact, NBS has been an integral part of preventable health care for over five decades, ever since the discovery that phenylketonuria is an easily diagnosed, preventable cause of intellectual disability. Over the past two decades, there have been dramatic advances in screening technology, with a resulting increase in the number and complexity of disorders on NBS panels. This enhanced ability to screen brings questions about what types of disorders are appropriate for NBS. To that end, the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (ACHDNC) was established in 2003 to make evidence-based recommendations at the national level regarding the suitability of various disorders for NBS. At present, the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) includes 35 core disorders. The RUSP nomination process uses information about disease incidence and severity, natural history, benefits of early detection, safety and efficacy of treatment, analytic and clinical validity of the screening tests, as well as consideration of potential harms associated with screening and public health impact to determine whether a particular disorder is appropriate for NBS. However, there are many disorders for which this data is insufficient or missing. There are other disorders that challenge traditional NBS criteria by having predominantly later-onset phenotypes, poorly defined natural history, or unclear treatment outcomes. As these potentially life-threatening disorders might benefit from early detection, gathering and analyzing this data is both critical and timely. Accordingly, there is a great deal of interest in pilot NBS studies as a means to gather objective evidence about whether a disorder is appropriate for widespread screening. ScreenPlus is a comprehensive, fluid, pilot NBS program that will screen 100,000 consented infants for specific disorders that are under consideration for universal NBS. This study will generate critical data about the validity of testing for these candidate disorders and provide estimates of disease incidence in a large newborn population. The investigators will evaluate different consent and engagement models, including direct, in-person interaction and the use of an electronic consent framework to educate parents about pilot NBS. The investigators will also collect nuanced information about the ethical implications of NBS, by conducting qualitative interviews with parents of children who have received a positive or uncertain NBS result. Parents who are eligible to participate in ScreenPlus will also have the opportunity to complete a flexible set of surveys of parent opinions about expanded NBS, research using dried blood spots, and other relevant topics. Furthermore, newborns who screen positive will be followed by a ScreenPlus physician. Through thoughtful collaboration with disease experts, the investigators will help systematically collect disease specific measures through detailed long-term follow-up which will enable us to critically evaluate how affected children identified through ScreenPlus are faring, allowing objective assessment of the impact early diagnosis has on outcome. The investigators will share this important data with the NBS community to help inform objective decision-making about widespread screening recommendations. The ScreenPlus panel is fluid and disorders may be added/removed as disorders satisfy the study inclusion criteria. Additionally, recognizing that the NIH, advocacy groups, academics, and private industry all share a desire for clean, consented pilot NBS data, the investigators created a unique financial infrastructure. This investigator-driven arrangement permits all stakeholders to obtain aggregate data of interest in a mutually beneficial and cost-effective manner. ScreenPlus is guided by Scientific and Community Advisory Boards, who are comprised of rare disease experts, biochemistry specialists, physicians, bioethicists, and patient advocates. Overall, the investigators anticipate that ScreenPlus will become the premier consented pilot NBS program in the United States. In sum, ScreenPlus will provide critical data about the appropriateness of NBS for candidate disorders, the feasibility and effectiveness of consented screening models, and parent informational needs and preferences as they relate to NBS for complex disorders.
AI summaryWhat participation may involve, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴
AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.
With parental permission, the infant's newborn screening sample will be tested for the ScreenPlus panel and parents may be invited to complete optional online surveys. If a screen is positive, the infant will be referred to a ScreenPlus physician for confirmatory testing (clinical exam and molecular, enzymatic, and biomarker studies when available); confirmatory testing is provided at no cost. Families of infants with positive or uncertain results may be invited to qualitative interviews. Infants confirmed to have a ScreenPlus disorder will receive long-term follow-up with disease-specific measures and help connecting to counseling, treatment, clinical trials, specialists, and emotional/social support resources.
How the study is structured. This is an observational, prospective, consented pilot screening program. Parents choose whether their newborn is screened; screened blood samples undergo multi-tier testing for a flexible set of disorders. Infants with positive screens are referred for no-cost confirmatory molecular, enzymatic, and biomarker testing and are followed by a ScreenPlus physician for longer-term data collection. The study also uses online surveys and qualitative interviews with parents to study consent models and ethical, legal, and social issues.
Questions you could ask
These questions are suggestions for a conversation with the study team or your own clinician, not advice.
- The registry lists this study under Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency; Ceroid Lipofuscinosis, Neuronal, 2; Cerebrotendinous Xanthomatosis; Fabry Disease; GM1 Gangliosidosis; Gaucher Disease; Lysosomal Acid Lipase Deficiency; Metachromatic Leukodystrophy; Mucopolysaccharidosis II; Mucopolysaccharidosis III-B; Mucopolysaccharidosis IV A; Mucopolysaccharidosis VI; Mucopolysaccharidosis VII; Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C. Does it apply to my diagnosis?
- This is an observational study, so the study itself gives no treatment. What would taking part involve for me, and would it change my usual care?
- The registry says participants are enrolled by invitation. Who decides who is invited, and how?
- The listed sites are in United States. Is any of them reachable for me, and does the study help with travel?
- Which of the eligibility criteria would need to be checked with tests before I could join?
More on Sanfilippo syndrome
This trial is also listed on this site under Fabry disease, Gaucher disease, Hunter syndrome, metachromatic leukodystrophy and Niemann-Pick disease type C.
Important dates
- Study start
- May 10, 2021
- Primary completion
- Aug 31, 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 31, 2029 (estimated)
- Target enrollment
- 100000 participants (estimated)
- Last updated on registry
- Jul 28, 2026
- Data verified
- Oct 10, 2026
Sponsor and research team
The lead sponsor funds and oversees the trial. A pharmaceutical or biotech company sponsor typically means the study is testing that company's drug or device; a hospital, university, or government agency usually indicates investigator-initiated or publicly funded research.
- Lead sponsor
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- BioMarin Pharmaceutical
- Cure Sanfilippo Foundation
- Dana's Angels Research Trust (DART)
- Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Orchard Therapeutics
- Passage Bio, Inc.
- Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
- Sio Gene Therapies
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.
- The FireFly Fund
- The Noah's Hope - Hope 4 Bridget Family Foundations
- Travere Therapeutics, Inc.
- Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc
- Ara Parseghian Medical Research Fund
- New York State Department of Health
- Case Western Reserve University
- Chiesi USA, Inc.
- Mayo Clinic Biopharma Diagnostics
Participating sites (9)
- Maimonides Medical Center
Brooklyn, New York, 11219 · United States
- NYU Langone Hospital - Brooklyn
Brooklyn, New York, 11220 · United States
- North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, 11030 · United States
- NYU Langone Health - Tisch Hospital
New York, New York, 10016 · United States
- Mount Sinai West
New York, New York, 10019 · United States
- Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, 10028 · United States
- Long Island Jewish Medical Center
Queens, New York, 11040 · United States
- Jack D. Weiler Hospital
The Bronx, New York, 10461 · United States
- ScreenPlus Coordinating Core, Children's Hospital at Montefiore
The Bronx, New York, 10467 · United States
Terms used on this page · explanations by MedicalUpdates.ai
- Inclusion Criteria
- The conditions a person must meet to be considered for the study, for example a confirmed diagnosis, an age range or a test result.
- Exclusion Criteria
- The conditions that rule a person out even if they meet the inclusion criteria, for example other illnesses, certain medicines or pregnancy.
- natural history
- A study that follows how a condition changes over time without assigning an experimental treatment. It may involve study visits and tests, and is often used to plan future trials.
- long-term follow-up
- Observation that continues for years after the study treatment, often required for gene and cell therapies.
The study record on this page is reproduced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, where it was submitted by the study sponsor. MedicalUpdates.ai does not own this content, is not affiliated with or endorsed by ClinicalTrials.gov, NIH, or the U.S. Government, and does not verify the record. Plain-language notes, the glossary and the questions above are added by this site; text in the boxes marked "AI summary" was written by an AI model and may contain errors. Registry records change over time. Check the original record for the current version and discuss eligibility or participation with a qualified healthcare professional.
← Back to clinical trials