ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02461615

A National Registry For Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis

Record copied from ClinicalTrials.gov: Oct 10, 2026AI summaries generated: Jul 27, 2026

A National Registry For Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis

StatusRecruitingThe study is currently enrolling participants. Only the study team can say whether a particular person can join.
Study typeObservationalA study in which researchers do not assign participants to a treatment or other intervention. They observe or measure what happens, which may include study visits, tests, questionnaires or a review of medical records.
SexAll
LocationUnited States
AI summaryWhat this study is about, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴

AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.

This observational registry collects information and home finger‑prick blood‑spot samples from people diagnosed with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP). Part A builds a national PAP registry and evaluates a dried blood‑spot (DBS) GM-CSF autoantibody test and DBS-based genetic testing; Part B reviews medical records to define the natural history of autoimmune PAP, develop a disease severity score, and pilot phone‑based exercise tests.

What it is studying. The study tests whether dried blood‑spot (DBS) samples can be used to measure GM‑CSF autoantibodies and genetic risk factors for PAP, estimates how common autoimmune PAP is among people with PAP, defines the clinical course (natural history) of autoimmune PAP from medical records, and develops and evaluates a composite disease severity score and mobile phone–based exercise tests as measures of disease severity.

What the researchers hope to learn. Establish a national PAP registry; validate DBS GM‑CSF autoantibody testing for diagnosing autoimmune PAP; estimate prevalence of autoimmune PAP; identify genetic risk factors detectable from DBS; define the natural history of autoimmune PAP; develop and test a composite disease severity score (aPAP‑DSS); evaluate remote, phone‑based exercise tests as measures of disease severity.

What this study is about

The study's own summary, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov. Underlined terms have a short explanation.

The major goal of Part A of this study is to establish a National PAP Registry to help make reliable new research tests available to doctors to improve the diagnosis of PAP, increase awareness and knowledge of PAP, and give patients a 'seat at the table' in planning and conducting PAP research including the clinical testing of several new potential therapies. The major goal of Part B of this study is to define the natural history of autoimmune PAP (aPAP), develop a disease severity score that reflects how aPAP patients feel and function, and to develop and test novel tools to measure the severity of aPAP lung disease. Funding Source - FDA OOPD

Eligibility

The criteria exactly as listed on ClinicalTrials.gov. Only the study team can say whether they apply to you.

Inclusion criteria

  • for Part A and Part B:
  • Written informed consent and assent, if applicable
  • Inclusion Criteria for Part A (Cross Sectional Study of PAP Syndrome)
  • History of chest computed tomogram or chest radiograph findings compatible with PAP
  • History of diagnosis of PAP made by at least one of the following methods:
  • Positive (Abnormal) serum GMAb test -OR-
  • Lung biopsy clearly documenting the presence of PAP of any type or degree -OR-
  • Bronchoalveolar lavage cytology compatible with PAP -OR-
  • Recessive or compound mutations in genes known to cause PAP, i.e. GM-CSF receptor α or β chain, GM-CSF, surfactant protein B or C or ABCA3, ABCG1, ABCA1, TTF1
  • Inclusion Criteria For Part B (Longitudinal \& PRO Survey Study of autoimmune PAP Patients)
  • Diagnosis of autoimmune PAP as indicated by:
  • Positive (Abnormal) Serum GMAb Test -AND-
  • History of chest CT or x-rays findings compatible with PAP -OR-
  • Lung biopsy clearly documenting the presence of PAP of any type or degree -OR-
  • Bronchoalveolar lavage cytology compatible with PAP

Exclusion criteria

  • or Part A and Part B:
  • Individuals who have a serious medical illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to interfere with completion of the study will be excluded.
  • For Part A (Cross-sectional Study of PAP Syndrome)
  • Individuals that do not have a diagnosis of PAP
  • For Part B (Longitudinal \& PRO Survey Study of autoimmune PAP Patients)
  • Individuals that do not have a diagnosis of autoimmune PAP

Study description and what participation involves

The study's detailed description, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Show the detailed description from the registry

PAP is a rare syndrome of surfactant accumulation and resulting hypoxemic respiratory failure that occurs in a number of diseases classified pathogenically into three groups: primary PAP (caused by disruption of GM-CSF signaling - autoimmune PAP, hereditary PAP), secondary PAP (caused by reduction in alveolar macrophage numbers and/or functions), and surfactant dysfunction-related PAP (caused by mutations in genes required for normal surfactant production). In current clinical practice, PAP is diagnosed based on a lung biopsy; an approach that is not able to identify the PAP-causing disease in anyone. Current therapy involves the physical removal of surfactant by a procedure in which the lungs are repeatedly filled with saline and emptied - whole lung lavage, which is invasive, inefficient, and not widely available, especially for children. Importantly, research advances have elucidated the pathogenesis of diseases causing PAP in most patients and have identified new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Simple blood-based research tests can now identify the PAP-causing disease in about 95% of patients. Further, several promising potential disease-specific therapies are currently in development. The long-term goals of the Rare Lung Diseases Consortium include improving the diagnosis and therapy of people with PAP. Part A: A major goal of this protocol is to establish a National PAP Registry. Our central hypothesis is that a nationwide campaign to enroll and communicate with a large cohort of PAP patients will have important benefits including 1) accelerating the translation of research diagnostics into clinical practice, 2) increasing knowledge among patient and healthcare communities about PAP, and 3) engagement of PAP patients and doctors in planning and conducting PAP research. The specific objectives of this study are to: 1) determine the ability of the DBSC GMAb Test to correctly identify autoimmune PAP among people with PAP of any type, 2) estimate the prevalence of autoimmune PAP, 3) increase communication and knowledge about PAP-causing diseases, PAP research advances, and future research studies among PAP patients, healthcare providers, the medical community, the PAP Foundation, the Translational Pulmonary Science Center (TPSC) and the general public, 4) evaluate the ability of DBSC-based test to correctly identify genetic factors that increase the risk of developing PAP; and 5) to evaluate the ability of the DBSC GMAb Test to correctly identify autoimmune PAP among people with PAP of any type, or another lung diseases, and healthy controls. The target population is any person diagnosed with PAP. The study design will involve recruitment, screening, and enrollment of Participants via short telephone-based study visits, completion of questionnaires, and collection of capillary blood from the fingertip by Participants in their home using a DBSC, which are then sent by US mail to the TPSC for evaluation. The experimental approach will compare GMAb levels from DBSCs from Participants diagnosed with PAP and determine the fraction of autoimmune PAP patients among individuals with PAP. DBSC-based genetic testing will be compared to current blood-based methods for identification of known genetic risk factors for developing PAP. Lastly, DBSC GMAb values will be compared to GMAb values from healthy and lung disease controls to determine the ability of the DBSC GMAb test to identify patients with autoimmune PAP. Anticipated results will establish a National PAP registry, validate tests for diagnosis of diseases causing PAP in more than 90% of patients, increase awareness and understanding of PAP among patients and healthcare providers, and provide for a patient voice in PAP research. These results will impact the field by: 1) transforming how PAP is diagnosed, 2) increasing access to diagnostic testing - of special importance to those in remote locations, and 3) engaging PAP patient and healthcare communities in planning and implementing PAP research including a prospective natural history study and clinical trials evaluating several potential, disease-specific therapies. Part B: A major goal of Part B of this protocol is to perform a retrospective, longitudinal, chart-based natural history study of aPAP, to develop a disease severity score that reflects how aPAP patients feel and function, including objective measures of lung function and pathology, and to develop and test novel tools to measure the severity of aPAP lung disease. Our central hypothesis is that defining the natural history of aPAP using an outcome measure that incorporates how patients feel, function, and breathe as a function of the severity of their disease and developing tools to measure clinical outcomes will accelerate pharmacotherapeutic development for aPAP. The specific objectives of Part B of this study are to: 1) perform a retrospective, longitudinal, chart-based natural history study of aPAP, 2) host focus groups to obtain patient input regarding health survey content, 3) establish a disease severity score that reflects how aPAP patients feel and function and that includes objective measures of lung function and pathology, and 4) evaluate the ability of a mobile phone-based exercise test to monitor disease severity in aPAP patients. The target population are patients diagnosed with aPAP. The study design will involve review of retrospective, longitudinal review of medical records from aPAP patients and engagement of the patient community to establish a disease severity score that reflects how aPAP patients feel and function and to test a home-based method to remotely evaluate the exercise capacity of aPAP patients. The experimental approach will be to collect and review retrospective, longitudinal medical records of aPAP patients. Additionally, participants will release routine clinic data to the study team and complete questionnaires that measure symptoms, function, and quality of life at the time of routine clinic visits to facilitate development of an aPAP disease severity score (aPAP-DSS). The aPAP-DSS will be a composite of patient-reported and objective function data measuring patient's breathlessness - using a dyspnea index (Dyspnea-I), oxygen delivery - using a lung function index (LungFxn-I), therapeutic oxygen requirement - using a supplemental oxygen index (sO2-I), and health status and function - using a quality of life index (QoL-I). We will compare the multivariate aPAP-DSS with A-aDO2 - the gold standard for measuring lung dysfunction in aPAP, with radiological lung density - a direct measure of amount of pathological surfactant accumulation that causes the clinical manifestations of aPAP, and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire - a health outcomes tool. Lastly, aPAP patients will also be able to participate in the pilot testing of a mobile phone-based app to measure the exercise capacity. Specifically, we will evaluate the ability of the 5-minute standardized exercise protocol (STEP) test (5MST) to outperform the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) as a measure of impaired exercise capacity in aPAP patients and the accuracy and acceptability of the app-based remote 6MWT and 5MST compared to standardized clinic-based exercise testing. Anticipated results will be collection and organization of data on the natural history of aPAP and identification of gaps that can be addressed in a future prospective natural history study. We will also evaluate novel tools to measure aPAP disease severity and exercise capacity via a remote, home-based application. These results will impact the field by 1) improving our understanding of the clinical course of aPAP, 2) providing a simple tool to measure disease severity in terms of how aPAP patients feel and function using information readily available in the standard medical record, and 3) develop and test a novel patient-reported outcome assessment tool to measure how aPAP patient's function.

AI summaryWhat participation may involve, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴

AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.

Participants give consent, complete short phone visits and questionnaires, and be observed as part of the registry for about 5 years. For Part A you will collect a small fingertip capillary blood sample onto a dried blood‑spot card at home and mail it to the study team. For Part B the study will review your past medical records, you may release routine clinic data, join focus groups, complete questionnaires at clinic visits, and pilot a phone‑based exercise test (5‑minute step test or remote 6‑minute walk) that records oxygen saturation and heart rate. No invasive study procedures beyond the home blood‑spot collection are listed in the registry record.

How the study is structured. This is a prospective observational registry with two linked parts. Part A is a cross‑sectional registry: participants complete phone visits and questionnaires, collect a home capillary (finger‑prick) dried blood spot (DBS) card and mail it for laboratory testing to evaluate GM‑CSF autoantibodies and DBS‑based genetic analyses. Part B is a retrospective, longitudinal chart review and patient engagement effort to create and test an autoimmune‑PAP disease severity score (combining symptoms, lung function, oxygen needs, and quality of life), run focus groups, and pilot mobile phone–based remote exercise tests (5‑minute step test and remote 6‑minute walk comparisons). Registry follow‑up and outcome measurement are planned over approximately five years.

Questions you could ask

These questions are suggestions for a conversation with the study team or your own clinician, not advice.

  • This is an observational study, so the study itself gives no treatment. What would taking part involve for me, and would it change my usual care?
  • The listed sites are in United States. Is any of them reachable for me, and does the study help with travel?
  • Which of the eligibility criteria would need to be checked with tests before I could join?

More on pulmonary alveolar proteinosis

Important dates

Study start
April 2015
Primary completion
December 2030 (estimated)
Study completion
December 2030 (estimated)
Target enrollment
500 participants (estimated)
Last updated on registry
Mar 17, 2026
Data verified
Oct 10, 2026

Sponsor and research team

The lead sponsor funds and oversees the trial. A pharmaceutical or biotech company sponsor typically means the study is testing that company's drug or device; a hospital, university, or government agency usually indicates investigator-initiated or publicly funded research.

Lead sponsor
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Collaborators
  • Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)

Central study contact

If you're interested in participating, the central contact can answer general questions about the study — including eligibility requirements and how to find a recruiting site near you. Actual eligibility is determined by the site's medical team.

Participating sites (1)

Terms used on this page · explanations by MedicalUpdates.ai

Registry
An organised collection of information about people with a particular condition, gathered over time for research. Joining a registry usually means sharing medical information, not receiving a treatment.
natural history
A study that follows how a condition changes over time without assigning an experimental treatment. It may involve study visits and tests, and is often used to plan future trials.
Written informed consent
The process of explaining a study, including its risks and what participation involves, so that a person can decide freely whether to take part. Consent is usually documented in writing, and a participant can choose to leave the study later.
assent
A child's or dependent adult's agreement to take part, given alongside the formal consent of a parent or legal representative.
Inclusion Criteria
The conditions a person must meet to be considered for the study, for example a confirmed diagnosis, an age range or a test result.
biopsy
Removal of a small piece of tissue so it can be examined under a microscope. 'Biopsy-proven' or 'histologically confirmed' means the diagnosis was confirmed by examining tissue under a microscope.
CT
An X-ray scan that builds detailed cross-section images of the body. 'High-resolution' CT (HRCT) is used to look closely at the lungs.
Exclusion Criteria
The conditions that rule a person out even if they meet the inclusion criteria, for example other illnesses, certain medicines or pregnancy.
cohort
A group of people who share a characteristic, such as a diagnosis, and are studied together. 'Prospective' means they are followed forward from enrolment; 'retrospective' means existing records are reviewed.
enrollment
The number of participants a study plans to include, or has included. 'Estimated' means the planned number; 'actual' means the number who joined.
outcome measure
Something the study measures to judge its results, such as a symptom score, a blood test or survival. Outcomes are grouped as primary, secondary and sometimes exploratory.
6-minute walk test
A test of how far a person can walk on a flat surface in six minutes. It is used to measure stamina and to track change over time.

The study record on this page is reproduced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, where it was submitted by the study sponsor. MedicalUpdates.ai does not own this content, is not affiliated with or endorsed by ClinicalTrials.gov, NIH, or the U.S. Government, and does not verify the record. Plain-language notes, the glossary and the questions above are added by this site; text in the boxes marked "AI summary" was written by an AI model and may contain errors. Registry records change over time. Check the original record for the current version and discuss eligibility or participation with a qualified healthcare professional.

← Back to clinical trials