ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06645626

Utilisation of Health Services and Quality of Life in Patients With Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes

Record copied from ClinicalTrials.gov: Oct 10, 2026AI summaries generated: Jul 27, 2026

Utilisation of Health Services and Quality of Life in Patients With Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes

StatusRecruitingThe study is currently enrolling participants. Only the study team can say whether a particular person can join.
Study typeObservationalA study in which researchers do not assign participants to a treatment or other intervention. They observe or measure what happens, which may include study visits, tests, questionnaires or a review of medical records.
Age18 years old and older
SexAll
LocationUnited Kingdom
AI summaryWhat this study is about, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴

AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.

This prospective observational study follows people with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal degeneration (CBS), or multiple system atrophy (MSA) to compare quality of life and health-service use over 12 months. Patients and their unpaid carers complete questionnaires at enrollment and every six months; some participants have in-person assessments for cognition and disease severity. The study compares people seen in specialist multidisciplinary clinics with those seen in non-specialist settings and links questionnaire data to clinical records and national data.

What it is studying. Whether and how different levels of specialist support and services are associated with patients' and carers' quality of life, health-service use, and related costs.

What the researchers hope to learn. To identify which aspects of specialist and community services relate to patient and carer quality of life, health-care use and costs, and to compare time to disease milestones and other outcomes between specialist and non-specialist care settings.

What this study is about

The study's own summary, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov. Underlined terms have a short explanation.

The study will compare health care utilisation and quality of life for patients with progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal syndrome and multiple system atrophy in different parts of the region that our specialist clinic operates in with different services as well as in other regions with no specialist clinics. This study aims to investigate which aspects of the service are most beneficial for the patients and to determine the influence of support services and specialty clinics on patients and their carers.

Eligibility

The criteria exactly as listed on ClinicalTrials.gov. Only the study team can say whether they apply to you.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients and their carers must:
  • Be aged 18 or over
  • Have capacity to consent at the beginning of their involvement
  • Have a diagnosis of a neurodegenerative disease which includes progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal syndrome and multiple system atrophy but may include other closely related diseases where the presentation is similar, such as Alzheimer's disease where they present with a corticobasal syndrome

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients or carers not meeting the inclusion criteria
  • Patients with static deficits only who do not have a neurodegenerative syndrome.
  • Patients who the principal investigator feels are not suitable to take part due to co-morbidities or participation in other trials.

Study description and what participation involves

The study's detailed description, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Show the detailed description from the registry

Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), Multiple system atrophy (MSA) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS) are rare neurological diseases which rapidly get worse. They cause problems with movement, vision, thinking, swallowing and speech and currently have no treatment to cure the disease or to treat many of the symptoms. They look superficially like Parkinson's disease and so are called collectively atypical Parkinsonian syndromes (APS). Quality of life for patients and their family is very poor; worse than motor neuron disease for example. Due to all the problems related to their illness patients often have to be admitted as an emergency and need a lot of care. Currently there is little research on how patients should be cared for by the NHS. While there are many variations in types of clinics, two different models for NHS clinics are 1) a Neurology Consultant seeing them in clinic alone or 2) a Neurologist seeing them in a specialist multidisciplinary (MDT) clinic with a clinic coordinator in close cooperation with community teams consisting of speech and language therapists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, palliative care and a Neurology nurse. The second type of clinic would be more expensive but may provide the patient and their family with more information about the disease and support. This could improve the patient and carer\'s ability to manage the disease, the patient and carer\'s quality of life and experience of care, and may reduce emergency admissions to hospital. The clinic the investigators run in Wessex covers three counties with a wide variation in services on offer. In some of the patch community services are scarce and patients find it very difficult to come into the central clinic where the coordinator is based. In other parts there is a very comprehensive service with coordinators and multiple health professionals organised into a responsive and dedicated community MDT. The variation of MDT involvement in our clinic\'s catchment area enables us to study the influence of different levels of support on our patients. Our study includes two stages: In the first stage, we will investigate the impact of different availability of services within our specialist clinic catchment area to determine the relative impact of support services on patients and their carers. The second stage will compare patients from our specialist clinic to patients seen elsewhere in the country in a non specialist setting. This will provide a much starker contrast of differences in care and outcomes. Patient recruitment would be from our clinic list; however for patients who do not attend a specialist centre from different regions of the country we will be collaborating with the PSP Association (PSPA) to help us identify interested patients. Informed consent is an absolute pre-requisite for participation in this study. Explicit consent will be obtained at the start of the study with regards ongoing involvement in the study in the event of loss of capacity. This research will assess patients using quantitative methods. Using questionnaires, patients and their carers (i.e. family members or friends who provide unpaid support) will be asked about their quality of life and how much the patients use health services at the beginning of the research and every 6 months to see if there is a difference between the types of care. Quality of life data will be collected using a commonly used (EQ-5D-5L) or disease specific (PQOL, PSPQOL, MSAQOL) QOL measures. Additional information will be collected from patients including age, disease duration, medication, impulsivity \& apathy (collected using the Cambridge Behavioural inventory revised [CBI-r] and the Cambridge Questionnaire for Apathy and Impulsivity Traits [CAMQUAIT - A Cambridge questionnaire). Disease severity and cognition will be assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MOCA] for cognition and PSP rating scale [PSPRS], PSP Clinical Deficits scale[PSPCDS] or unified MSA rating scale [UMSARS] for disease severity to ensure that recruited patients are as similar as possible with regard to disease type, stage and disability. The researcher will also access clinical data to provide contextual information regarding the patient and their disease as outlined above. This will predominantly be at UHS for QOLAPS1 patients but may also be requested from other hospitals in the region and the GP. For QOLAPS2 patients we will request information from any NHS hospital in the region and their GP. We will also request data from NHS digital and other UK NHS databases - in particular the Office of National Statistics (ONS). This will predominantly be for mortality data which will enable us to look at outcomes including duration of disease, cause and place of death and we will look to relate that to the clinical care patients received. A few of the assessments require an in-person assessment such as the MOCA and the PSPRS, PSPCDS or UMSARS. These measures are often a normal part of our clinical care and will be done at the patient's clinic visit. For the group of patients who are not attending our clinics, we would arrange a home visit and carry out the assessments at the patient's home.

AI summaryWhat participation may involve, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴

AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.

Participants (and their carers) will complete questionnaires about quality of life and health‑service use at enrollment and every six months (for example at 0, 6 and 12 months). Some assessments require an in‑person visit—examples are the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) for thinking and disease severity scales (PSPRS, PSPCDS, or UMSARS)—these can be done at clinic visits or at a home visit if needed. The study team will request and review clinical records from hospitals and GPs and use NHS databases (including mortality data) to record outcomes such as disease milestones and death. Informed consent is required before any study procedures begin.

How the study is structured. A prospective observational cohort comparing two groups (specialist multidisciplinary clinic patients versus patients from non-specialist clinics). Participants complete questionnaires at baseline and every six months; some have in-person tests for cognition and disease severity. Researchers will review medical records and national data (for outcomes such as mortality and time to disease milestones). No experimental treatment is assigned.

Questions you could ask

These questions are suggestions for a conversation with the study team or your own clinician, not advice.

  • This is an observational study, so the study itself gives no treatment. What would taking part involve for me, and would it change my usual care?
  • The listed sites are in United Kingdom. Is any of them reachable for me, and does the study help with travel?
  • Which of the eligibility criteria would need to be checked with tests before I could join?

More on progressive supranuclear palsy

This trial is also listed on this site under multiple system atrophy.

Important dates

Study start
Oct 10, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2026 (estimated)
Study completion
Jul 15, 2027 (estimated)
Target enrollment
198 participants (estimated)
Last updated on registry
Oct 17, 2024
Data verified
Oct 10, 2026

Sponsor and research team

The lead sponsor funds and oversees the trial. A pharmaceutical or biotech company sponsor typically means the study is testing that company's drug or device; a hospital, university, or government agency usually indicates investigator-initiated or publicly funded research.

Lead sponsor
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

Central study contact

If you're interested in participating, the central contact can answer general questions about the study — including eligibility requirements and how to find a recruiting site near you. Actual eligibility is determined by the site's medical team.

Participating sites (1)

Terms used on this page · explanations by MedicalUpdates.ai

inclusion criteria
The conditions a person must meet to be considered for the study, for example a confirmed diagnosis, an age range or a test result.
principal investigator
The doctor or scientist responsible for running the study at a site or overall.
Exclusion Criteria
The conditions that rule a person out even if they meet the inclusion criteria, for example other illnesses, certain medicines or pregnancy.
Informed consent
The process of explaining a study, including its risks and what participation involves, so that a person can decide freely whether to take part. Consent is usually documented in writing, and a participant can choose to leave the study later.

The study record on this page is reproduced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, where it was submitted by the study sponsor. MedicalUpdates.ai does not own this content, is not affiliated with or endorsed by ClinicalTrials.gov, NIH, or the U.S. Government, and does not verify the record. Plain-language notes, the glossary and the questions above are added by this site; text in the boxes marked "AI summary" was written by an AI model and may contain errors. Registry records change over time. Check the original record for the current version and discuss eligibility or participation with a qualified healthcare professional.

← Back to clinical trials