ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07731971
Digital Outcome Assessment Using AI Active Gaming and Motion Capture in Friedreich Ataxia
Fusion of Therapeutic AI Active Gaming With Motion Capture to Create a Novel Digital Clinical Outcome Assessment (dCOA) in Friedreich Ataxia
AI summaryWhat this study is about, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴
AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.
This observational study develops and validates a digital clinical outcome assessment (dCOA) using active video-game tasks tracked by a single camera and AI. It includes people with Friedreich ataxia across a range of severity and healthy volunteers. In a single lab visit participants perform ~20 minutes of movement-based gaming while researchers record marker-based full-body motion capture, AI markerless motion capture, brain activity (fNIRS), and continuous ECG; people with FA also do monthly 20–30 minute home gaming sessions for 12 weeks with brief telehealth check-ins.
What it is studying. The study is testing whether game-play performance and AI-derived, markerless motion-capture data give reliable, valid, and responsive measurements of motor function in Friedreich ataxia, and whether patients find the platform acceptable and usable. It compares the game-based and AI metrics with gold-standard marker-based motion capture and established clinical scales.
What the researchers hope to learn. Scientifically, the study aims to develop and validate a digital clinical outcome assessment (dCOA) for Friedreich ataxia by assessing concurrent validity versus the modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) and marker-based motion capture, measuring reliability and responsiveness over time, identifying which game-derived or biomechanical metrics discriminate disease severity, and evaluating platform usability and acceptability.
What this study is about
The study's own summary, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov. Underlined terms have a short explanation.
Friedreich ataxia (FA) is a rare, inherited condition that progressively affects balance, coordination, and walking. Clinical trials of new FA treatments rely largely on standard clinical rating scales, but these can be tiring for patients, feel disconnected from everyday life, and may not detect small but meaningful changes over time. More objective, sensitive, and patient-relevant ways of measuring movement are needed. This study is developing and testing a new digital way of measuring movement in FA. Participants play short, movement-based computer games on a laptop while a single camera and artificial-intelligence (AI) software track how they move. The proposition is that the way a person plays these games - their speed, accuracy, and movement quality - can provide objective, meaningful measurements of motor function. In the laboratory, these game-based measurements are compared against a "gold-standard" full-body motion-capture system and against established clinical scales to check how accurate and meaningful they are. The study involves both people with Friedreich ataxia (across a range of disease severity) and healthy volunteers. People with FA also take part in a 12-week home phase, playing the games at home each month with remote support, so the researchers can examine whether the digital measurements are reliable when repeated and whether they can detect change over time. The study asks whether these digital, game-based movement measurements are reliable, valid, and sensitive enough to be used as a "fit-for-purpose" digital clinical outcome assessment (dCOA) in future FA clinical trials, and whether patients find the platform acceptable, usable, and relevant to daily life. This is an early-stage feasibility and validation study designed to establish proof of concept rather than to test the effectiveness of a treatment.
Interventions being studied
Being studied in this trial does not mean the treatment or procedure is approved or available for this condition.
- Device
- Laboratory validation session (VSimulator)
- Home-based active gaming assessment
Eligibility
The criteria exactly as listed on ClinicalTrials.gov. Only the study team can say whether they apply to you.
Inclusion criteria
- Friedreich ataxia group:
- Aged 12 to 50 years
- Genetically confirmed Friedreich ataxia
- Able to sit or stand independently for 5 minutes
- Able to provide informed consent (or assent with parental consent if under 16 years)
- Stable medication regimen (no changes in the past 4 weeks)
- Healthy control group:
- Aged 12 to 50 years
- No history of genetically confirmed Friedreich ataxia
- Able to sit or stand independently for 5 minutes
- Able to provide informed consent (or assent with parental consent if under 16 years)
Exclusion criteria
- Friedreich ataxia group:
- Aged 11 years or younger, or 51 years or older
- Severe cognitive impairment precluding task comprehension
- Active seizure disorder, or vestibular dysfunction causing nausea with non-immersive VR
- Currently participating in an interventional clinical trial
- No reliable internet connection (where a digital inclusion pack cannot resolve this)
- Any reason precluding safe participation in moderate-intensity exercise.
- Healthy control group:
- Aged 11 years or younger, or 51 years or older
- Genetically confirmed Friedreich ataxia
- Any reason precluding safe participation in moderate-intensity exercise.
Study description and what participation involves
The study's detailed description, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Show the detailed description from the registry
Design and rationale STEP-OUT FA is an observational, prospective cohort study (STROBE-compliant) developing and validating a digital clinical outcome assessment (dCOA) for Friedreich ataxia. It addresses a well-documented limitation in FA therapeutic development: existing semi-quantitative clinical outcome assessments are affected by floor and ceiling effects, limited responsiveness across disease stages, and poor patient-perceived relevance, which have contributed to repeated failures of drug trials to meet primary endpoints. The study evaluates whether motor-performance metrics captured during gamified, semi-immersive virtual-reality (VR) tasks, combined with markerless AI motion analysis, can serve as reliable, valid, and responsive outcome measures. Measurement platform The platform is delivered through a standard laptop and integrates three components: (1) FA-adaptable VR gamified tasks (e.g., ball catching, target reaching) with adjustable difficulty; (2) automated extraction of gaming-performance metrics; and (3) a single-camera, patented AI-driven markerless motion-capture system for 3D pose reconstruction (DigiTherapix Ltd), used to derive biomechanical/kinematic metrics. The gaming environment is provided via the MoveHero platform (University of São Paulo). Laboratory validation (healthy controls and FA participants) Validation is conducted at the University of Exeter VSimulator facility against a gold-standard, marker-based full-body motion-capture reference. During a single laboratory visit (~2 hours), participants complete a familiarisation period followed by a ~20-minute session of four movement-based gaming tasks. Concurrent signals are recorded throughout: full-body optical motion capture (reflective markers on shoulders, elbows, knees, ankles, forehead), continuous heart-rate variability via a Delsys ECG sensor (baseline, task, recovery), and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) over the forehead to index cortical activation. Perceived exertion and fatigue (Borg RPE and Borg VAS Fatigue) are collected after each task, and a short semi-structured interview captures usability and acceptability feedback (audio-recorded for later transcription). FA participants additionally complete clinical characterisation at baseline. Home-based longitudinal phase (FA participants only) To evaluate test-retest reliability and responsiveness, FA participants enter a 12-week home phase with monthly self-administered or remotely supported gaming sessions (~20-30 minutes) at Weeks 4, 8, and 12, each accompanied by a brief telehealth check-in with a physiotherapist to confirm continued consent, provide support, and monitor adverse events. Data are captured automatically and remotely. A remote follow-up assessment at Week 12 repeats clinical and patient-reported measures and includes a short interview. Analytic approach Concurrent validity is assessed via correlations between digital metrics and established clinical scales; reliability via intraclass correlation coefficients across repeated sessions; and responsiveness via within-subject change and effect sizes, with longitudinal mixed-effects modelling of dCOA trajectories across the home-phase time points. Analyses characterise which individual or composite metrics (gaming-derived versus biomechanical) show optimal measurement properties and best discriminate disease severity. As an exploratory feasibility and validation study establishing proof of concept and psychometric properties, no formal power calculation was performed; the sample size was justified on precision for reliability estimation and on precedent from rare-disease dCOA validation studies. Collaborators and data governance The AI motion-analysis platform is provided by DigiTherapix Ltd (UK) and the gaming platform by the University of São Paulo (Brazil); formal sub-contractor and data-sharing agreements govern intellectual property and data governance. No personally identifiable participant data are transferred outside the UK. Oxford University Hospitals acts as a Participant Identification Centre only.
AI summaryWhat participation may involve, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴
AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.
You will attend a single laboratory visit (about 2 hours) to familiarise yourself and then perform four short movement-based computer game tasks (around 20 minutes of task time). During the visit your movements will be recorded by a single camera with AI-driven markerless motion capture alongside a gold-standard marker-based full-body motion-capture system (reflective markers on shoulders, elbows, knees, ankles and forehead), continuous heart-rate recording (ECG), and functional near‑infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) over the forehead. After each task you will rate perceived exertion and fatigue and take part in a brief semi-structured interview about usability; Friedreich ataxia participants also complete baseline clinical characterisation. People with Friedreich ataxia additionally take part in a 12-week home phase using a loaned laptop to play the games at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 (each session ~20–30 minutes) with automated remote data capture, brief telehealth check-ins with a physiotherapist, and a Week 12 remote follow-up repeating clinical and patient-reported measures plus a short interview.
How the study is structured. A prospective, observational cohort study. Both groups complete one laboratory validation visit with gamified movement tasks recorded by a gold-standard marker-based motion-capture system alongside a single-camera AI markerless system, plus fNIRS and continuous ECG. Healthy volunteers provide reference data and complete the lab visit only. Participants with Friedreich ataxia also take part in a 12-week home phase with self-administered or remotely supported monthly gaming sessions (Weeks 4, 8, 12) and brief telehealth physiotherapy check-ins; home sessions use the AI markerless capture on a loaned laptop and automatic remote data upload.
Questions you could ask
These questions are suggestions for a conversation with the study team or your own clinician, not advice.
- This is an observational study, so the study itself gives no treatment. What would taking part involve for me, and would it change my usual care?
- The registry says recruitment has not started. When is it expected to open, and can I register interest now?
- The listed sites are in United Kingdom. Is any of them reachable for me, and does the study help with travel?
- Which of the eligibility criteria would need to be checked with tests before I could join?
More on Friedreich ataxia
Important dates
- Study start
- Jul 30, 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
- Target enrollment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Last updated on registry
- Jul 28, 2026
- Data verified
- Oct 10, 2026
Sponsor and research team
The lead sponsor funds and oversees the trial. A pharmaceutical or biotech company sponsor typically means the study is testing that company's drug or device; a hospital, university, or government agency usually indicates investigator-initiated or publicly funded research.
- Lead sponsor
- University of Exeter
- Collaborators
- University of Oxford
Central study contact
If you're interested in participating, the central contact can answer general questions about the study — including eligibility requirements and how to find a recruiting site near you. Actual eligibility is determined by the site's medical team.
- Talita Dias da Silva Magalhaes 📞 +44 (0) 1392 661000 ✉ t.dias.magalhaes@exeter.ac.uk
- Kim Chapman ✉ k.chapman3@exeter.ac.uk
Participating sites (1)
- University of Exeter
Exeter · United Kingdom
- Talita Dias da Silva Magalhaes · +44 (0) 1392 661000 · t.dias.magalhaes@exeter.ac.uk
- Kim L Chapman · k.chapman3@exeter.ac.uk
Terms used on this page · explanations by MedicalUpdates.ai
- informed consent
- The process of explaining a study, including its risks and what participation involves, so that a person can decide freely whether to take part. Consent is usually documented in writing, and a participant can choose to leave the study later.
- assent
- A child's or dependent adult's agreement to take part, given alongside the formal consent of a parent or legal representative.
- control group
- The group the study treatment is compared with. It may receive a placebo, an existing treatment (active comparator), a sham procedure, or no intervention.
- interventional
- A study in which researchers assign participants to one or more interventions, such as a drug, procedure, device, behavioural programme or other approach, to measure their effects.
- Exclusion Criteria
- The conditions that rule a person out even if they meet the inclusion criteria, for example other illnesses, certain medicines or pregnancy.
- prospective cohort
- A group of people who share a characteristic, such as a diagnosis, and are studied together. 'Prospective' means they are followed forward from enrolment; 'retrospective' means existing records are reviewed.
- endpoints
- Something the study measures to judge its results, such as a symptom score, a blood test or survival. Outcomes are grouped as primary, secondary and sometimes exploratory.
- ECG
- A recording of the heart's electrical activity. QTc is one measurement from it; some drugs are avoided if it is prolonged.
- baseline
- Measurements taken at the start of the study, before any study treatment, so that later results can be compared with them.
- adverse events
- Any unwanted medical problem that happens during a study, whether or not it was caused by the treatment. A 'serious' adverse event is one that meets specific criteria, such as causing death, being life-threatening, requiring or prolonging hospital admission, causing significant disability, or another medically important outcome.
- follow-up
- The period after treatment or enrolment during which participants are observed or contacted, for example to record side effects or outcomes.
The study record on this page is reproduced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, where it was submitted by the study sponsor. MedicalUpdates.ai does not own this content, is not affiliated with or endorsed by ClinicalTrials.gov, NIH, or the U.S. Government, and does not verify the record. Plain-language notes, the glossary and the questions above are added by this website; text in the boxes marked "AI summary" was written by an AI model and may contain errors. Registry records change over time. Check the original record for the current version and discuss eligibility or participation with a qualified healthcare professional.
← Back to clinical trials