ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07444333
Cardiac Output and Fatigue in Friedreich's Ataxia
Cardiac Output and Fatigue in Friedreich's Ataxia
AI summaryWhat this study is about, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴
AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.
This pilot treatment study will enroll 30 people with Friedreich's ataxia to test a home aerobic exercise program given with or without omaveloxolone. All participants receive a recumbent exercise bike and follow a 3-month, moderate-intensity cycling program; 20 participants will be on omaveloxolone and 10 will not. Key measurements (including VO2max, cardiac output, and fatigue scales) are collected at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
What it is studying. The study tests three things: (1) whether home aerobic exercise is acceptable and feasible for people with Friedreich's ataxia, (2) whether omaveloxolone affects change in maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) during an exercise program, and (3) how aerobic training and omaveloxolone together relate to fatigue. It also measures cardiac output and other walking and balance tests to explore physiological and functional changes.
What the researchers hope to learn. To assess feasibility and safety of home aerobic training in Friedreich's ataxia; to evaluate VO2max as a potential outcome measure for future trials; to determine whether omaveloxolone affects changes in VO2max and measures of fatigue when combined with aerobic training; and to measure cardiac output and functional outcomes alongside these endpoints. Note: omaveloxolone can cause a temporary increase in fatigue (around the first ~12 weeks), which the study monitors closely.
What this study is about
The study's own summary, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov. Underlined terms have a short explanation.
This is a clinical trial examining to impact of aerobic training plus omaveloxolone in FRDA. Thirty individuals with FRDA will be recruited; 20 individuals will be on omaveloxolone treatment whereas the other ten individuals will not. Individuals will undergo baseline assessment including cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), mFARS, gait speed, Timed Up and Go (TUG), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS), and 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT). Individuals will then perform 3-months of home aerobic training. Repeat assessments will be conducted at 3- and 6-months.
Interventions being studied
Being studied in this trial does not mean the treatment or procedure is approved or available for this condition.
- Behavioral
- Aerobic Exercise
Eligibility
The criteria exactly as listed on ClinicalTrials.gov. Only the study team can say whether they apply to you.
Inclusion criteria
- Genetically confirmed FRDA
- Ability to safely ride a stationary bicycle (mFARS sitting posture sub-score <2)
Exclusion criteria
- Beck depression score >19, a score that precludes ability to exercise.
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score <23/30
- Disorders that interfere with ability to perform endurance exercise (e.g., stroke, respiratory problems, traumatic brain injury, or neuromuscular disease).
- Regular participation in vigorous endurance exercise (defined as >2 days/week for at least the past 4 months at max HR>65%).
- Evidence of serious arrhythmias or ischemic heart disease.
Study description and what participation involves
The study's detailed description, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Show the detailed description from the registry
In February 2023, omaveloxolone became the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medication for Friedreich's Ataxia (FRDA). In its pivotal study, named MOXIe, researchers found that omaveloxolone significantly improved neurological function compared to placebo. The primary outcome measure was the modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS), the gold standard for measuring ataxia symptoms in clinical trials for FRDA. However, there are several limitations with the use of mFARS:
- It does not detect subtle disease progression over short time frames. For example, in MOXIe, differences between placebo and omaveloxolone were not detected until 48 weeks.
- Some of the components of mFARS rely on clinical judgment, which can introduce variability between raters.
- The minimal clinical important difference (MCID) for mFARS has not been clearly defined.
- The scale lacks sensitivity to detect changes in individuals with minimal symptoms or advanced disease.
Given these limitations, development of additional outcome measures for clinical trials to determine the impact of drugs like omaveloxolone is desirable. In this study, investigators propose using maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) as a future primary outcome measure for FRDA clinical trials. VO2max offers several advantages as an outcome measure:
- It is a direct physiological measure of aerobic capacity, reducing subjectivity compared to clinical scales like mFARS.
- It can detect subtle changes in aerobic function making it useful for monitoring intervention effects over time.
- It has a defined MCID, and higher VO2max is associated with better health outcomes making it a clinically meaningful endpoint.
- It is non-invasive and reproducible.
To examine the utility of VO2max as a primary outcome measure, this study will recruit 30 individuals with FRDA in this pilot study. Twenty individuals will be on omaveloxolone treatment whereas the other 10 individuals will not. Individuals will undergo baseline cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to determine VO2max. Secondary measures will include cardiac output. All participants will be given a recumbent bicycle for home use. Participants will be expected to cycle 30-minutes per session, 5x per week at 65-75% maximum heart rate (moderate intensity) for 3-months. To track training, individuals will be given a Fitbit Charge 6, and an exercise physiologist will call every two weeks to adjust training as needed. To determine benefits of training with omaveloxolone, repeat assessments will occur at 3- and 6-months. AIM 1: Acceptability and Feasibility of Home Aerobic Exercise. Individuals with other types of ataxia have been able to train at the above levels safely. We hypothesize that there will be no serious adverse events related to aerobic training, and there will be an acceptable number of minor adverse events. The investigators further hypothesize that drop-out from the trial will be less than 25%. AIM 2: Impact of Omaveloxolone on VO2max. Omaveloxolone works by activating and preventing the degradation of Nuclear factor-like 2 (Nrf2), which helps prevent oxidative damage within the mitochondria of individuals with FRDA. Improved mitochondrial function should significantly enhance VO2max by increasing ATP production and improving the rate of oxygen consumption. Thus, the investigators hypothesize that individuals on omaveloxolone will have a significantly larger increase in VO2max after the aerobic training when compared to individuals who are not on omaveloxolone. AIM 3: Impact of Aerobic Training + Omaveloxolone on Fatigue. Omaveloxolone has been shown to cause a transient (12-week) increase in fatigue. Aerobic training, on the other hand, is known to improve fatigue in individuals with other hereditary ataxias. For this aim, the primary outcome measure will be the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) with secondary measures of Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) and 6-minute walk test (6MWT). The investigators hypothesize improved fatigue with the incorporation of aerobic training and that individuals in the omaveloxolone group will have less fatigue than those not on omaveloxolone. This pilot study will provide the foundation for the use of VO2max as an outcome measure in future FRDA trials. It will also examine the synergistic effect of omaveloxolone and aerobic training which may show greater improvement than either intervention alone, including improvements in fatigue.
AI summaryWhat participation may involve, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴
AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.
Participants will have a baseline maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) with breath-by-breath VO2 measurement and non-invasive cardiac output assessment, with repeat CPETs at 3 and 6 months. They will receive a recumbent exercise bike for home use and be asked to cycle about 30 minutes per session, five times per week at 65–75% of maximum heart rate for three months, tracked with a study-provided Fitbit. An exercise physiologist will call every two weeks to monitor progress and adjust the program. Other study visits at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months include functional tests and questionnaires for fatigue, walking, balance, and ataxia symptoms.
How the study is structured. Interventional treatment study with two parallel groups (non-randomized): one group of participants who are on omaveloxolone and one group who are not. All participants follow the same home aerobic training plan, receive a recumbent bike and Fitbit, and have cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and other assessments at 0, 3, and 6 months; the study is single-masked and compares outcomes between the two groups.
Questions you could ask
These questions are suggestions for a conversation with the study team or your own clinician, not advice.
- The listed sites are in United States. Is any of them reachable for me, and does the study help with travel?
- Which of the eligibility criteria would need to be checked with tests before I could join?
More on Friedreich ataxia
Important dates
- Study start
- Jul 15, 2026
- Primary completion
- Feb 1, 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 1, 2028 (estimated)
- Target enrollment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Last updated on registry
- Sep 22, 2026
- Data verified
- Oct 10, 2026
Sponsor and research team
The lead sponsor funds and oversees the trial. A pharmaceutical or biotech company sponsor typically means the study is testing that company's drug or device; a hospital, university, or government agency usually indicates investigator-initiated or publicly funded research.
- Lead sponsor
- Scott Barbuto
- Collaborators
- Biogen
Central study contact
If you're interested in participating, the central contact can answer general questions about the study — including eligibility requirements and how to find a recruiting site near you. Actual eligibility is determined by the site's medical team.
- Scott Barbuto, MD PhD 📞 12123054818 ✉ sb3779@cumc.columbia.edu
Participating sites (1)
- Columbia University Irving Medical CenterRecruiting
New York, New York, 10032 · United States
- Scott M Barbuto, MD PhD · 212-305-3535 · sb3779@cumc.columbia.edu
- Scott M Barbuto, MD PhD
Terms used on this page · explanations by MedicalUpdates.ai
- baseline
- Measurements taken at the start of the study, before any study treatment, so that later results can be compared with them.
- 6-minute Walk Test
- A test of how far a person can walk on a flat surface in six minutes. It is used to measure stamina and to track change over time.
- Inclusion Criteria
- The conditions a person must meet to be considered for the study, for example a confirmed diagnosis, an age range or a test result.
- Exclusion Criteria
- The conditions that rule a person out even if they meet the inclusion criteria, for example other illnesses, certain medicines or pregnancy.
- placebo
- A treatment that looks like the study treatment but contains no active ingredient. Some participants receive it instead of the study treatment, usually without knowing which they got.
- primary outcome measure
- The main result the study is designed to measure and report on. Other results, called secondary outcomes, are also collected.
- outcome measures
- Something the study measures to judge its results, such as a symptom score, a blood test or survival. Outcomes are grouped as primary, secondary and sometimes exploratory.
- serious adverse events
- Any unwanted medical problem that happens during a study, whether or not it was caused by the treatment. A 'serious' adverse event is one that meets specific criteria, such as causing death, being life-threatening, requiring or prolonging hospital admission, causing significant disability, or another medically important outcome.
The study record on this page is reproduced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, where it was submitted by the study sponsor. MedicalUpdates.ai does not own this content, is not affiliated with or endorsed by ClinicalTrials.gov, NIH, or the U.S. Government, and does not verify the record. Plain-language notes, the glossary and the questions above are added by this site; text in the boxes marked "AI summary" was written by an AI model and may contain errors. Registry records change over time. Check the original record for the current version and discuss eligibility or participation with a qualified healthcare professional.
← Back to clinical trials