ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07454343

ECD-Score: a Study on Erdheim-Chester Disease

Record copied from ClinicalTrials.gov: Oct 10, 2026AI summaries generated: Jul 27, 2026

Predicting Long-term Prognosis in Erdheim-Chester Disease: A New Comprehensive Approach

StatusRecruitingThe study is currently enrolling participants. Only the study team can say whether a particular person can join.
Study typeObservationalA study in which researchers do not assign participants to a treatment or other intervention. They observe or measure what happens, which may include study visits, tests, questionnaires or a review of medical records.
Age7 years old and older
SexAll
LocationFrance, Italy, United Kingdom, United States
AI summaryWhat this study is about, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴

AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.

This is a prospective observational cohort study of people with Erdheim‑Chester disease (both existing patients and new diagnoses) followed for up to five years. The study collects clinical and molecular data, treatment and response history, and patient questionnaires about quality of life. Researchers plan to analyze these data to build a comprehensive prognostic score and examine factors linked with survival and long-term organ damage.

What it is studying. The study aims to develop and evaluate a comprehensive prognostic score for ECD by testing how clinical features, organ involvement, molecular findings, treatments, treatment responses and toxicities, comorbidities, and patient-reported quality-of-life relate to overall survival and long-term outcomes.

What the researchers hope to learn. To create a prognostic score that predicts survival and long-term outcomes in ECD; to identify clinical and molecular factors associated with organ damage, treatment response, treatment toxicity, comorbidities, and quality of life.

What this study is about

The study's own summary, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov. Underlined terms have a short explanation.

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare form of non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis that primarily affects adults but may also occur in pediatric patients. It is characterized by the accumulation of foamy histiocytes with a distinctive immunophenotype in multiple anatomical sites, most commonly the long bones, retroperitoneal and perirenal tissues, the heart, the central nervous system, and the pituitary gland. The disease shows marked clinical heterogeneity, ranging from localized and asymptomatic forms to severe manifestations with multiorgan involvement. From a pathogenetic perspective, ECD is mainly driven by gain-of-function mutations affecting the MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways, particularly the BRAFV600E mutation, leading to aberrant activation of the MAPK and mTOR signaling pathways. The release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines plays a key role in systemic inflammation and tissue damage, resulting in significant complications and disability depending on the organs involved. Despite the significant efforts of international research in recent years, particularly given the extreme rarity of the disease (incidence below 5 cases per 10,000,000 adults per year), substantial knowledge gaps remain, especially with regard to the prediction of long-term outcomes, both in terms of survival and disability. Although some prognostic factors associated with survival have already been identified (such as central nervous system involvement), to date only limited-scale studies have systematically evaluated the prognosis of patients with ECD, focusing in particular on factors influencing organ-specific complications. Moreover, in clinical practice, several aspects that significantly affect patients' quality of life tend to be underestimated, partly due to the time required to perform comprehensive assessments using detailed questionnaires designed to quantify disease-related consequences, such as chronic disability, depression, and cognitive impairment. Nevertheless, there is a growing need for and interest in these parameters, commonly referred to as patient-reported outcomes. In light of these considerations, the development and implementation of a comprehensive prognostic score aimed at predicting survival and long-term disease outcomes could improve the overall assessment of patients and provide more accurate and clinically meaningful prognostic information.

Eligibility

The criteria exactly as listed on ClinicalTrials.gov. Only the study team can say whether they apply to you.

Inclusion criteria

  • informed consent signed by the patient or, for minors, by a parent or legal guardian
  • confirmed diagnosis of ECD according to the latest international guidelines (Goyal G, Blood 2020)
  • availability of clinical, molecular, treatment and response to therapy data
  • a minimum follow-up period of one year.

Exclusion criteria

  • lack of diagnostic or follow-up data
  • refusal or inability to sign the informed consent form

Study description and what participation involves

The registry record has no detailed description beyond the summary above.

AI summaryWhat participation may involve, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴

AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.

Participants will attend outpatient study visits and allow researchers to collect and review their clinical, molecular, treatment, and treatment-response records. They will be asked to complete validated questionnaires about quality of life and other outcomes. Researchers will follow participants over time (minimum one year; outcomes assessed up to five years) to record organ involvement, treatments, survival, and related events. The registry record does not list additional invasive procedures (for example, biopsies or spinal taps) as required.

How the study is structured. A prospective, observational cohort study. Participants' existing and future clinical and molecular records will be collected and researchers will ask participants to complete validated quality-of-life and other questionnaires. Data on treatments, responses, organ damage, comorbidities, and survival will be followed and analyzed over a five-year period. No experimental treatments are assigned by the study.

Questions you could ask

These questions are suggestions for a conversation with the study team or your own clinician, not advice.

  • This is an observational study, so the study itself gives no treatment. What would taking part involve for me, and would it change my usual care?
  • The listed sites are in France, Italy, United Kingdom, United States. Is any of them reachable for me, and does the study help with travel?
  • Which of the eligibility criteria would need to be checked with tests before I could join?

More on Erdheim-Chester disease

Important dates

Study start
Dec 23, 2024
Primary completion
June 2028 (estimated)
Study completion
December 2028 (estimated)
Target enrollment
1000 participants (estimated)
Last updated on registry
Mar 6, 2026
Data verified
Oct 10, 2026

Sponsor and research team

The lead sponsor funds and oversees the trial. A pharmaceutical or biotech company sponsor typically means the study is testing that company's drug or device; a hospital, university, or government agency usually indicates investigator-initiated or publicly funded research.

Lead sponsor
Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS
Principal investigator
Augusto Vaglio, Principal Investigator
Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS

Central study contact

If you're interested in participating, the central contact can answer general questions about the study — including eligibility requirements and how to find a recruiting site near you. Actual eligibility is determined by the site's medical team.

Participating sites (7)

  • National Institute of HealthNot Yet Recruiting

    Bethesda, Maryland, 20892 · United States

    • Kevin O'Brien, Medical Doctor
  • Mayo ClinicNot Yet Recruiting

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55902 · United States

    • Matthew J. Koster, Medical Doctor
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNot Yet Recruiting

    New York, New York, 10065 · United States

    • Eli L. Diamond, Medical Doctor
  • Hopital Pitiè-SalpetriereNot Yet Recruiting

    Paris · France

    • Julien Haroche, Medical Doctor
  • Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, FirenzeRecruiting

    Florence, Fi, 50134 · Italy

  • San Raffaele HospitalNot Yet Recruiting

    Milan, Italy · Italy

    • Lorenzo Dagna, Medical Doctor
  • Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNot Yet Recruiting

    Newcastle, Newcastel · United Kingdom

    • Matthew Collin, Medical Doctor

Terms used on this page · explanations by MedicalUpdates.ai

informed consent
The process of explaining a study, including its risks and what participation involves, so that a person can decide freely whether to take part. Consent is usually documented in writing, and a participant can choose to leave the study later.
legal guardian
A person who is legally allowed to make decisions, including consent to research, on behalf of someone who cannot consent for themselves.
follow-up
The period after treatment or enrolment during which participants are observed or contacted, for example to record side effects or outcomes.
Inclusion Criteria
The conditions a person must meet to be considered for the study, for example a confirmed diagnosis, an age range or a test result.
Exclusion Criteria
The conditions that rule a person out even if they meet the inclusion criteria, for example other illnesses, certain medicines or pregnancy.

The study record on this page is reproduced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, where it was submitted by the study sponsor. MedicalUpdates.ai does not own this content, is not affiliated with or endorsed by ClinicalTrials.gov, NIH, or the U.S. Government, and does not verify the record. Plain-language notes, the glossary and the questions above are added by this site; text in the boxes marked "AI summary" was written by an AI model and may contain errors. Registry records change over time. Check the original record for the current version and discuss eligibility or participation with a qualified healthcare professional.

← Back to clinical trials