ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07795047
Umbilical Cord Glucose
Umbilical Cord Glucose: A Novel Screening Method for Congenital Hyperinsulinism to Prevent Brain Damage
AI summaryWhat this study is about, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴
AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.
This interventional screening study tests whether arterial umbilical cord blood glucose (UCBG) at birth can identify newborns with pathological congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI). Newborns with low arterial UCBG (≤3.5 mmol/L) will receive early bedside glucose monitoring and diagnostic testing; infants confirmed with pathological HI will be invited for developmental follow-up at about 6 months including Bayley testing, EEG, and MRI. The study also evaluates diagnostic accuracy, optimal thresholds, point-of-care glucometer performance, and selected samples of screen-negative infants to estimate false-negative rates.
What it is studying. The study is testing if measuring arterial umbilical cord blood glucose at birth, using a predefined cut-off (≤3.5 mmol/L), can serve as an effective screening test to detect pathological neonatal hyperinsulinism. It aims to validate reference ranges and thresholds, measure diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, AUC), assess bedside and point-of-care glucose measurements, and describe early neurological and developmental status of identified cases at about 6 months.
What the researchers hope to learn. To validate umbilical cord blood glucose measurement as a screening test for pathological neonatal hyperinsulinism; to define diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values, AUC) and optimal cut-offs; to evaluate point-of-care glucometer use for cord glucose; to estimate false-negative and false-positive rates and adherence to the screening protocol; and to describe early neurological and developmental findings at approximately 6 months in infants identified by the screening.
What this study is about
The study's own summary, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov. Underlined terms have a short explanation.
Congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) causes persistent neonatal hypoglycemia that, if untreated, can lead to neurodevelopmental impairments (NDI) such as cognitive delays, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and blindness. Despite being preventable with early diagnosis and treatment, 30-50% of affected infants still suffer NDI. Transient HI occurs in about 1 in 1,200 births, while persistent forms are rarer. Current screening focuses on high-risk groups but misses many infants with HI, resulting in delayed diagnosis and brain injury. Our pilot research suggests that measuring umbilical cord blood glucose (UCBG), already routinely collected for other purposes, can serve as a timely, non-invasive screening test for HI. Arterial UCBG below 3.5 mmol/L showed excellent accuracy in predicting pathological HI. This project aims to validate UCBG screening for neonatal HI, implement a national screening program, and assess the neurological outcomes of screen-positive infants. Planned studies:
- A review will analyze current screening strategies and the impact of delayed diagnosis on brain outcomes
- A nationwide, prospective study in Denmark will implement UCBG screening in all newborns. Infants with arterial UCBG below 3.5 mmol/L will undergo hypoglycemia monitoring and diagnostic testing. Diagnostic accuracy and optimal thresholds will be evaluated.
- Neurological follow-up at 6 months will assess development using standardized cognitive and motor tests, EEG, and MRI.
- A retrospective observational study to investigate whether UCBG can provide improved risk stratification for hypoglycaemia in infants born to mothers with diabetes.
Interventions being studied
Being studied in this trial does not mean the treatment or procedure is approved or available for this condition.
- Diagnostic test
- For the screening, the interventions will be glucose measurements (and possibly G-BOBH), while follow-up assessments will include Bayley testing, EEG, and MRI.
Eligibility
The criteria exactly as listed on ClinicalTrials.gov. Only the study team can say whether they apply to you.
Inclusion criteria
- Study 2:
- Live-born neonates delivered at participating Danish hospitals during the study period.
- arterial umbilical cord blood glucose (UCBG) ≤3.5 mmol/L.
- Written informed consent obtained from parent(s) or legal guardian(s).
- Study 3:
- Infants diagnosed with pathological neonatal hyperinsulinism (HI) following UCBG screening in Study 2.
- Written informed consent obtained from parent(s) or legal guardian(s) for participation in the follow-up study.
Exclusion criteria
- Study 2:
- No predefined clinical exclusion criteria.
- Missing or unsuccessful arterial umbilical cord blood sampling resulting in an unavailable UCBG measurement.
- Withdrawal of parental consent.
- Study 3:
- No predefined clinical exclusion criteria.
- Withdrawal of parental consent.
Study description and what participation involves
The study's detailed description, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Show the detailed description from the registry
Although preventable with earliest possible diagnosis and treatment, the frequency of neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI; brain damage) in congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) still reaches 30-50%, including delayed psychomotor development, cognitive impairment, cerebral palsy, epilepsy and blindness. The incidence of transient HI ("perinatal stress hyperinsulinism") has been estimated to 1:1,200, whereas persistent HI occurs in 1:10,000 to 1;40,000. Both transient and persistent hyperinsulinism, here together named pathological HI, impose, unfortunately, a high risk of NDI if not promptly diagnosed and treated. According to the classical WHO consensus, an ideal universal screening should be performed with a suitable test to diagnose a condition early enough to institute an effective treatment. Moreover, the screening must be specific, affordable, harmless, and worldwide applicable. From a yet unpublished retrospective pilot study, a novel proposal has been established of how to implement timely screening by use of umbilical cord blood glucose (UCBG), which is already routinely measured in cord gas analysis for asphyxia, to predict neonatal HI. Until today, the use of UCBG screening for neonatal hypoglycemia is virtually a complete overlooked possibility, not only in Denmark, but internationally. In pilot study, reference intervals has been established for UCBG and showed that arterial (from the neonate to the placenta) UCBG below 3.5 mmol/L (65 mg/dL) had an excellent diagnostic performance in predicting pathological HI in the four included cases. The overall aim of this study is to further develop this new and proposed ideal screening tool, in diagnosing neonatal pathological HI with the perspective of global implementation. Research Plan Study 1 and 4 are not included in this description. Sub study 2. Prospective national study of UCBG screening for pathological HI Aim: to test the diagnostic performance of the pilot UCBG screening program on neonatal pathological HI in a prospective national 1-year cohort in Denmark. Research question: Can measurement of arterial umbilical cord blood glucose (UCBG) with a cut-off value of ≤ 3.5 mmol/L (65 mg/dL) be used as an effective screening method to identify neonates with pathological hyperinsulinism (HI) in a national prospective birth cohort in Denmark? Methods: Expected approx. 9000 screen-positive cases among which a proportion (unknown, but estimated 30%) will have other risk factors ie. SGA, LGA or maternal diabetes, that would in any case have led to blood glucose monitoring.
- In collaboration with all Danish neonatal hospital units and their obstetrical wards, venous and arterial UCBG sampling will be optimized as a part of cord the routine gas analysis with implementation of routine UCBG data transfer to the hospital central labs.
- The pilot study normal reference for venous and arterial UCBG will be validated.
- In a smaller sample, variations of UCBG will be analyzed for the impact of time from birth to UCBG analysis. Expected 50 cases.
- Neonates with UCBG arterial glucose ≤ 3.5 mmol/L will be allocated to bedside glucose controls 1-2 and 3-4 hours after birth
- For determination of the false negative rate, a small sample of neonates (n=120) with UCBG arterial glucose above or at 3.5 mmol/L without any predefined risk factors of hypoglycemia, will undergo blood glucose measurements 6 times until 72 hours of age.
- Cases with pathological HI will be identified according to specified and uniform diagnostic criteria: Diagnostic test for hyperinsulinism (plasma glucose, serum insulin and C-peptide) during hypoglycemia will performed on the children according to a specified protocol, e.g. requirement of iv-glucose beyond 48 hours of age to prevent hypoglycemia; an i.v. glucose demand above 8 mg/kg/minute to obtain normoglycemia; prior to a decision of diazoxide treatment.
- Other information will be collected, including adherence to the new screening program, age at diagnosis of neonatal HI, severity of hypoglycemia and treatment.
- Concomitant bedside samples of glucose and ketones (β-OH-butyrate; together named G-BOHB) will be performed regularly until 72 hours' age or until intervention for hypoglycemia is started in cases with arterial UCBG <2.5 mmol/L and in the group of screen-negative patients (n=120) to evaluate the natural history of G-BOHB in the neonatal transitional hypoglycemia period (6 samples per neonate). Expected 50-100 cases + 120 screen-negative.
- For the perspective of global implementation, hand-held point-of-care (POC) glucometer UCBG will be measured in addition to cord gas glucose to evaluate the diagnostic performance of UCBG screening by POC glucometers.
Expected findings: Given the prevalence of transitional and persistent pathological HI and an annual birth rate of 60,000 in Denmark, a high participation rate and a diagnostic sensitivity close to 1,00, UCBG is expected to identify 50 Danish neonates with pathological HI during 1 year's national study. A high diagnostic performance and demonstration of robustness of the method will add to the fulfilment of optimal screening method criteria. Inclusion: All live-born neonates delivered at Danish hospitals during the study period are eligible for inclusion. Exclusion: There are no predefined clinical exclusion criteria, but neonates for whom umbilical cord blood glucose measurement is not available due to unsuccessful or missing cord blood sampling will not be included. Sub study 3. Neurological follow-up on patients with congenital hyperinsulinism after implementation of arterial UCBG screening Aim: To evaluate the neurological and developmental status of children at the age of 6 months, diagnosed with pathological neonatal HI by UCBG screening. Research question: What is the neurological and developmental status at 6 months of age in infants diagnosed with pathological neonatal hyperinsulinism through umbilical cord blood glucose (UCBG) screening? Methods: All pathological HI cases identified in Sub study 2 will be invited at 6 months' age for;
- Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development IV: To assess fine and gross and motor development, giving each infant a raw and scaled score and percentile compared to the normal age-matched material.
- EEG: To detect eventual epileptiform activity as a complication to hypoglycemia.
- MRI scan: To identify cerebral complications to neonatal hypoglycemia.
Expected findings: Following the implementation of the new screening protocol for pathological HI, a significant reduction in the incidence of hypoglycemia-related NDI among affected infants is expected. As the study study has no control group, only literature data on the prevalence of NDI from congenital hyperinsulinism will be used for comparison. During the study period, two national laboratory data extractions of insulin measurements in newborns under 3 months of age will be done. This will serve two purposes: first, to ensure that all cases eligible for inclusion in Sub-study 3 are captured; and second, to assess adherence to UCBG screening and identify any false-negative cases. Insulin is only measured in newborns, when HI is suspected. In the event of incidential findings, the child will be referred to a relevant hospital department for further evaluation and follow-up. Parents will be informed without delay, if findings requiring further assessment are identified. In cases where sedation is not sufficient, an individual assessment will be made in collaboration with the parents as to whether the MRI should be performed under general anesthesia. General anaesthesia will only be used if it seems clinically relevant and will be administered in accordance with standard paediatric anaesthetic guidelines. Statistical analysis Diagnostic accuracy will be assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and corresponding false positive and false negative rates. Estimates will be presented with 95% confidence intervals. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses will be performed to evaluate the discriminative ability of arterial UCBG. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. Neurological and developmental outcomes at 6 months of age will be analysed descriptively. All analyses will be performed using STATA. Perspectives Given the pilot study, it is expected that UCBG screening as an ideal screening tool for pathological HI will be confirmed with a low prevalence of NDI at 6 months' follow-up. This will significantly reduce the burden for the individual families and lead to reduction in societal costs of supporting and treating children with NDI. Demonstration of the usefulness of UCBG screening will provide the basis for an implementation in clinical practice, not only in Denmark, but world-wide implementation in collaboration with the Core Research Network under the global patient organization Congenital Hyperinsulinism International.
AI summaryWhat participation may involve, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴
AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.
At birth, umbilical cord blood glucose (arterial and venous) will be measured as part of cord sampling; hand-held point-of-care glucometer readings may also be taken. Infants with low arterial cord glucose will have bedside blood-glucose checks in the first hours (typically at ~1–2 and 3–4 hours); those with very low values may have repeated glucose and ketone (G-BOHB) measurements (up to six samples) and diagnostic blood tests such as plasma glucose, serum insulin and C‑peptide if hypoglycemia occurs. A smaller group of infants with higher cord glucose will also have scheduled glucose checks to assess false negatives. Infants identified with pathological hyperinsulinism will be invited at about 6 months for developmental testing (Bayley Scales IV), an EEG, and a brain MRI — MRI may require sedation or general anesthesia in some cases, and parents will be informed and referred for further care if concerning findings are seen.
How the study is structured. This is an interventional screening study using a single-group design with no masking. At birth, arterial and venous umbilical cord glucose will be measured as part of routine cord sampling. Newborns whose arterial UCBG is at or below the threshold (≤3.5 mmol/L) will have early bedside glucose checks (typically 1–4 hours after birth) and, if very low (<2.5 mmol/L), more frequent glucose and ketone (G-BOHB) measurements. Diagnostic testing for hyperinsulinism (plasma glucose, insulin, and C‑peptide during hypoglycemia) will follow a specified protocol for suspected cases. A subset of infants with UCBG above the threshold without other risk factors will undergo scheduled glucose monitoring to estimate false negatives. Infants diagnosed with pathological HI will be assessed once at about 6 months with developmental testing (Bayley-IV), EEG, and brain MRI.
Questions you could ask
These questions are suggestions for a conversation with the study team or your own clinician, not advice.
- The registry says recruitment has not started. When is it expected to open, and can I register interest now?
- No sites are listed on the registry yet. Where will the study take place?
- Which of the eligibility criteria would need to be checked with tests before I could join?
More on congenital hyperinsulinism
Important dates
- Study start
- September 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- August 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- August 2028 (estimated)
- Target enrollment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Last updated on registry
- Aug 31, 2026
- Data verified
- Oct 10, 2026
Sponsor and research team
The lead sponsor funds and oversees the trial. A pharmaceutical or biotech company sponsor typically means the study is testing that company's drug or device; a hospital, university, or government agency usually indicates investigator-initiated or publicly funded research.
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University Hospital
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
- Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- Aalborg University Hospital
- Region Syddanmark
- Radiometer Medical ApS
- Congenital Hyperinsulinism International
Central study contact
If you're interested in participating, the central contact can answer general questions about the study — including eligibility requirements and how to find a recruiting site near you. Actual eligibility is determined by the site's medical team.
- Julie Siersbæk, MD, Ph.d.-student 📞 +45 21194289 ✉ julie.sierbaek@rsyd.dk
Participating sites
Study locations have not been posted on ClinicalTrials.gov yet. This study is not yet recruiting, so sites may be added when recruitment begins. The central study contact above may be able to tell you about planned sites.
Terms used on this page · explanations by MedicalUpdates.ai
- follow-up
- The period after treatment or enrolment during which participants are observed or contacted, for example to record side effects or outcomes.
- MRI
- A scan that uses magnets and radio waves, not X-rays, to make detailed pictures of the inside of the body. Some implants and metal objects mean a person cannot have one.
- observational study
- A study in which researchers do not assign participants to a treatment or other intervention. They observe or measure what happens, which may include study visits, tests, questionnaires or a review of medical records.
- Written informed consent
- The process of explaining a study, including its risks and what participation involves, so that a person can decide freely whether to take part. Consent is usually documented in writing, and a participant can choose to leave the study later.
- legal guardian
- A person who is legally allowed to make decisions, including consent to research, on behalf of someone who cannot consent for themselves.
- exclusion criteria
- The conditions that rule a person out even if they meet the inclusion criteria, for example other illnesses, certain medicines or pregnancy.
- Inclusion Criteria
- The conditions a person must meet to be considered for the study, for example a confirmed diagnosis, an age range or a test result.
- 1:1
- How many participants go to each group. In a 2:1 ratio, two are assigned to the first group for every one assigned to the second.
- cohort
- A group of people who share a characteristic, such as a diagnosis, and are studied together. 'Prospective' means they are followed forward from enrolment; 'retrospective' means existing records are reviewed.
- natural history
- A study that follows how a condition changes over time without assigning an experimental treatment. It may involve study visits and tests, and is often used to plan future trials.
- control group
- The group the study treatment is compared with. It may receive a placebo, an existing treatment (active comparator), a sham procedure, or no intervention.
The study record on this page is reproduced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, where it was submitted by the study sponsor. MedicalUpdates.ai does not own this content, is not affiliated with or endorsed by ClinicalTrials.gov, NIH, or the U.S. Government, and does not verify the record. Plain-language notes, the glossary and the questions above are added by this site; text in the boxes marked "AI summary" was written by an AI model and may contain errors. Registry records change over time. Check the original record for the current version and discuss eligibility or participation with a qualified healthcare professional.
← Back to clinical trials