ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07529860
AI-based Echocardiography for Detection of Cardiac Amyloidosis
AI-based Echocardiography for Detection of Cardiac Amyloidosis in Patients Undergoing Transthoracic Echocardiography With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
AI summaryWhat this study is about, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴
AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.
This study evaluates an AI-based echocardiography tool (Us2.ai) to detect signs of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis in adults with thickened heart walls (at least 12 mm) and echocardiographic warning signs of cardiac amyloidosis who have not previously been diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis. It includes a large retrospective review of prior echocardiograms and a prospective phase where AI findings are compared with clinically indicated tests such as 99mTc‑pyrophosphate (PYP) SPECT, cardiac magnetic resonance, and hematologic tests. The study will report how often AI and expert readers suspect ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, measures of diagnostic accuracy, and the condition's prevalence among referred patients.
What it is studying. The study tests whether an AI algorithm applied to transthoracic echocardiography can identify echocardiographic features suggestive of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, by comparing AI results with expert readings and follow-up diagnostic tests (99mTc‑PYP SPECT, cardiac magnetic resonance, and hematologic tests).
What the researchers hope to learn. Scientifically, the study aims to estimate the prevalence of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis among patients referred for echocardiography with red flags; compare AI versus expert cardiologist diagnostic suspicion; quantify AI sensitivity and specificity; identify which echocardiographic "red flags" are most specific or sensitive for the AI; compare Us2.V2 versus Us2.ca algorithm performance; measure diagnosis time differences between AI and specialists; and describe clinical characteristics of patients with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis.
What this study is about
The study's own summary, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov. Underlined terms have a short explanation.
Cardiac amyloidosis is characterized by deposition of misfolded protein in the myocardium causing mainly heart failure symptoms with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. There are also specific clinical (bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, polyneuropathy, skin bruising, ruptured biceps tendon…), biomarkers (disproportionally elevated NT-proBNP to the degree of heart failure, persistent elevated troponin, proteinuria..), electrocardiographic (reduced voltage of QRS, atrial fibrillation..) and echocardiographic features (concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, dilated atria, reduced global longitudinal strain with typical pattern of apical sparing, diastolic dysfunction…). Early diagnosis of the disease is crucial to identify patients that may benefit from appropriate treatment. Suspected cardiac amyloidosis on echocardiography or on cardiac magnetic resonance needs to prompt the request of serum free-light chain quantification and serum and urine immunofixation as well as single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using bone radiotracers. Echocardiography is the imaging technique of first choice to evaluate patients with dyspnea complaints and suspected heart failure as well as other pathologies. Echocardiography is a technique of first choice to evaluate patients with cardiovascular risk factors such as arterial hypertension and diabetes and many of those patients may have echocardiographic features that can be observed in early phases of cardiac amyloidosis. Currently, identification of patients with cardiac amyloidosis with available echocardiographic tools remains challenging. However, novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms applied to echocardiographic images for analysis may help the cardiologists in the identification of early phase of cardiac amyloidosis. Early diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis is key to implement effective therapies that have demonstrated to improve survival. Several studies have demonstrated the accuracy of AI-based algorithms applied to echocardiography for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. The hypothesis of the present prospective study is to evaluate the accuracy of the AI-based algorithm to identify patients with echocardiographic findings suggestive of cardiac ATTR amyloidosis using as ground truth the subsequent analysis with imaging techniques that permit its diagnosis such as 99mTc-pyrophosphate (PYP) SPECT and cardiac magnetic resonance as well as hematologic tests. If needed, histological confirmation on cardiac or extracardiac tissue could be performed, as recommended by recent consensus document from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. In addition, this study will help to answer the true prevalence of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis among patients referred to transthoracic echocardiography that present red flags for ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. The AI-based algorithm is the software Us2.ai which has been used in other populations for this purpose, as previously published.
Interventions being studied
Being studied in this trial does not mean the treatment or procedure is approved or available for this condition.
- Diagnostic test
- AI-based echocardiogram
Eligibility
The criteria exactly as listed on ClinicalTrials.gov. Only the study team can say whether they apply to you.
Inclusion criteria
- Patients 18 years old or older
- Left ventricular hypertrophy defined by a wall thickness of at least 12 mm
- Echocardiographic red flags of suspected cardiac amyloidosis
- Informed consent signed
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with poor echocardiographic acoustic window to allow proper analysis of the data
- Patients with known cardiac amyloidosis.
Study description and what participation involves
The study's detailed description, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Show the detailed description from the registry
Background: Cardiac amyloidosis is characterized by deposition of misfolded protein in the myocardium causing mainly heart failure symptoms with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. There are also specific clinical (bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, polyneuropathy, skin bruising, ruptured biceps tendon…), biomarkers (disproportionally elevated NT-proBNP to the degree of heart failure, persistent elevated troponin, proteinuria..), electrocardiographic (reduced voltage of QRS, atrial fibrillation..) and echocardiographic features (concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, dilated atria, reduced global longitudinal strain with typical pattern of apical sparing, diastolic dysfunction…). Early diagnosis of the disease is crucial to identify patients that may benefit from appropriate treatment. Suspected cardiac amyloidosis on echocardiography or on cardiac magnetic resonance needs to prompt the request of serum free-light chain quantification and serum and urine immunofixation as well as single photon emission computed tomography using bone radiotracers. Hypothesis: The use of artificial intelligence assisted algorithm applied to echocardiographic data may allow identification of suspected cardiac amyloidosis more precisely as compared to cardiologists with expertise in cardiac imaging. Methods: This project proposal will comprised 3 different phases: Phase 1: retrospective evaluation of clinically acquired echocardiographic data with reports indicating left ventricular hypertrophy (LV wall thickness ≥12 mm) and/or cardiac amyloidosis. This evaluation will consist of retrieval and analysis of echocardiographic data (around 20K studies) from 2022 to date. The data will be reanalysed by an experienced observer and a currently available artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm to detect suspected cardiac amyloidosis. The agreement between the algorithm and the observer will be tested. In those patients in whom the initial observer who reported the echocardiogram considered that there was suspicion of cardiac amyloidosis, the reports of additional test clinically required to confirm or rule out the diagnosis will be retrieved. Accordingly, the accuracy of the observer and the AI-based algorithm will be compared. Phase 2. Based on the results of Phase 1, which will informed about the prevalence of the condition, the duration of the prospective assessment of AI-based algorithm assisted echocardiographic image analysis will be estimated to see if this would augment the capacity of cardiologists to pick up early patients suspected to have cardiac amyloidosis. Phase 3. Pragmatic prospective AI-analysis assessment. Prospective analysis applying the AI-based algorithm to all patients presenting to the echo laboratory and following the clinically indicated diagnostic pathway to confirm or rule out cardiac amyloidosis according to contemporary guidelines. Patients will request to agree with the protocol and will sign informed consent. Result measures: The prevalence of cardiac amyloidosis will be analysed in the present project (Phase 1) and the agreement between the cardiologists experts in cardiac imaging and the artificial intelligence based algorithm will be reported. If it is demonstrated that the artificial intelligence-based algorithm provides a prevalence of true cardiac amyloidosis higher than the cardiologists, the impact in clinical practice is massive as a higher number of patients could be diagnosed and benefit from effective specific therapies, improving their clinical outcomes. Quantify diagnostic suspicion ratio of amyloidosis of AI vs physician (positive \& negative suspicion rates) Quantify the Echo Red Flags: AI vs physician recognized amyloidosis red flags (Red Flags will be guideline directed: wall thickness concentric and also affecting the right ventricle, "sparkling" aspect of the interventricular septum, lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum, atrial dilatation, pericardial effusion, reduced MAPSE and TAPSE, apical cherry pattern on global longitudinal strain analysis of the left ventricle, thickening of the leaflets of the heart valves, including aortic stenosis) Quantify the AI sensitivity \& specificity. Determine the most specific and most sensitive Red Flags for the AI vs physician (Automated Us2.v2 parameters only) Quantify the sensitivity \& specificity of Us2.V2 vs Us2.ca algorithm Diagnosis Time: Average time it takes for a specialist to diagnose by echo vs. the average time it takes for the AI algorithm to diagnose. Analysis of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis patient characteristics (e.g. HFpEF, HFmrEF, HFrEF, Atrial Fibrillation, Aortic Stenosis, other co-morbidities) Laboratory: The non-invasive cardiac imaging unit of the Heart Institute of the University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol performs 17,000 echocardiograms yearly, being more than 11,000 transthoracic echocardiograms. The collaboration with the department of nuclear medicine and radiology is excellent having access to cardiac magnetic resonance (700 studies performed yearly, and the expectations for next year will be around 1,000) and single photon emission computed tomography. Therefore, the feasibility of the project is high. The artificial intelligence-based algorithm for the analysis of the echocardiographic images is also in place and they can be analysed.
AI summaryWhat participation may involve, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴
AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.
If you join, your clinically ordered transthoracic echocardiogram images will be analyzed by an AI algorithm (Us2.ai) alongside an expert cardiology reading. If the AI or the clinician flags possible ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, you will be referred to the clinically indicated diagnostic pathway, which the registry names as 99mTc‑pyrophosphate (PYP) SPECT imaging and hematological tests and may include cardiac magnetic resonance. The record also states that, if needed, histological confirmation on cardiac or extracardiac tissue could be performed. You will be asked to agree to the study protocol and sign informed consent.
How the study is structured. This is an interventional diagnostic study with three phases: a retrospective review of existing echocardiograms, a planning phase to estimate prospective workload, and a pragmatic prospective phase applying the AI tool to patients presenting for transthoracic echocardiography. Allocation is non-randomized and sequential; there are two outcome paths for patients flagged by the AI (an 'AI-based diagnostic' pathway where further diagnostic testing is pursued, and a 'Control' pathway where further diagnostics are not pursued in consultation with the treating physician). There is no masking.
Questions you could ask
These questions are suggestions for a conversation with the study team or your own clinician, not advice.
- The registry lists this study under Cardiac Amyloidosis; Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFPEF); Left Ventricular Hypertrophy. Does it apply to my diagnosis?
- The registry says recruitment has not started. When is it expected to open, and can I register interest now?
- No sites are listed on the registry yet. Where will the study take place?
- Which of the eligibility criteria would need to be checked with tests before I could join?
More on ATTRv amyloidosis
This trial is also listed on this site under wild-type ATTR amyloidosis.
Important dates
- Study start
- Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- April 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- October 2028 (estimated)
- Target enrollment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Last updated on registry
- Jun 12, 2026
- Data verified
- Oct 10, 2026
Sponsor and research team
The lead sponsor funds and oversees the trial. A pharmaceutical or biotech company sponsor typically means the study is testing that company's drug or device; a hospital, university, or government agency usually indicates investigator-initiated or publicly funded research.
- Lead sponsor
- Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca
Central study contact
If you're interested in participating, the central contact can answer general questions about the study — including eligibility requirements and how to find a recruiting site near you. Actual eligibility is determined by the site's medical team.
- Victoria Delgado Garcia, MD, PhD 📞 +3493 497 8436 ✉ vdelgadog.germanstrias@gencat.cat
Participating sites
Study locations have not been posted on ClinicalTrials.gov yet. This study is not yet recruiting, so sites may be added when recruitment begins. The central study contact above may be able to tell you about planned sites.
Terms used on this page · explanations by MedicalUpdates.ai
- biomarkers
- Something measurable in the body, such as a blood test result or an imaging finding, that indicates how a condition or treatment is behaving.
- echocardiography
- An ultrasound scan of the heart. A transesophageal echocardiogram is done through a probe passed into the food pipe for a closer view.
- computed tomography
- An X-ray scan that builds detailed cross-section images of the body. 'High-resolution' CT (HRCT) is used to look closely at the lungs.
- Informed consent
- The process of explaining a study, including its risks and what participation involves, so that a person can decide freely whether to take part. Consent is usually documented in writing, and a participant can choose to leave the study later.
- Inclusion Criteria
- The conditions a person must meet to be considered for the study, for example a confirmed diagnosis, an age range or a test result.
- Exclusion Criteria
- The conditions that rule a person out even if they meet the inclusion criteria, for example other illnesses, certain medicines or pregnancy.
- Phase 1
- An early-stage study, usually small, mainly to check safety, side effects and how much of a treatment can be given. Whether it works is not the main question yet.
- Phase 2
- A study that tests whether a treatment has the intended effect and continues to check safety, usually in a larger group than phase 1.
- Phase 3
- A later-stage study, usually with more participants, designed to give stronger evidence about how well a treatment works and how safe it is. It often compares the treatment with standard care or a placebo, and results may support an application for approval.
The study record on this page is reproduced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, where it was submitted by the study sponsor. MedicalUpdates.ai does not own this content, is not affiliated with or endorsed by ClinicalTrials.gov, NIH, or the U.S. Government, and does not verify the record. Plain-language notes, the glossary and the questions above are added by this site; text in the boxes marked "AI summary" was written by an AI model and may contain errors. Registry records change over time. Check the original record for the current version and discuss eligibility or participation with a qualified healthcare professional.
← Back to clinical trials