ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07605429

BEACON - Phase III Clinical Study of Rugonersen in Angelman Syndrome.

Record copied from ClinicalTrials.gov: Oct 10, 2026AI summaries generated: Aug 25, 2026

A Randomized, Multi-center, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Phase III Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intrathecally Administered Rugonersen in Pediatric and Adult Participants With Angelman Syndrome

StatusRecruitingThe study is currently enrolling participants. Only the study team can say whether a particular person can join.
Study typeInterventionalA study in which researchers assign participants to one or more interventions, such as a drug, procedure, device, behavioural programme or other approach, to measure their effects.
PhasePhase 3A later-stage study, usually with more participants, designed to give stronger evidence about how well a treatment works and how safe it is. It often compares the treatment with standard care or a placebo, and results may support an application for approval.
AgeSee eligibility The registry's age field and its own written criteria give different ages for this study. Check the full criteria below and ask the study team.
SexAll
LocationUnited States
AI summaryWhat this study is about, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴

AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.

This Phase III study compares rugonersen given into the spinal fluid with a sham procedure in children and people who have Angelman syndrome. The main outcome is measured at week 56, followed by an open-label extension for longer-term evaluation. The study collects developmental testing, EEG data, and monitors safety.

What it is studying. The study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of rugonersen given intrathecally (into the spinal fluid) compared with a sham procedure in people with Angelman syndrome, using developmental tests and EEG measures and tracking adverse events.

What the researchers hope to learn. To determine whether intrathecal rugonersen changes developmental outcomes (Bayley-4 cognition and/or expressive communication) and EEG delta-band power compared with sham, and to assess safety including serious adverse events.

What this study is about

The study's own summary, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov. Underlined terms have a short explanation.

Purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrathecally administered rugonersen in pediatric and adult participants with Angelman syndrome.

Interventions being studied

Being studied in this trial does not mean the treatment or procedure is approved or available for this condition.

Drug
  • rugonersen
Procedure
  • Sham procedure

Eligibility

The criteria exactly as listed on ClinicalTrials.gov. Only the study team can say whether they apply to you.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female and ≥ 1 year to ≤ 50 years of age at signing of the informed consent form.
  • Independent of the age of the participant, the participant has a parent, caregiver or legal representative (herein after referred to as caregiver) who is reliable and competent in the Investigator's judgement. The caregiver is:
  • Able to consent for the participant according to ICH and local regulations,
  • At least 18 years of age,
  • Willing and able to accompany the participant to clinic visits and be available to the investigational site by telephone, email, or other electronic form as needed,
  • Is, and will likely remain, sufficiently knowledgeable of participant's condition throughout the study to be able to respond to queries, and is willing and able to complete caregiver assessments and inform the site personnel about the participant's condition as requested.
  • Clinical diagnosis of Angelman syndrome.
  • Pre-existing medical records confirm the clinical diagnosis of AS and the molecular diagnosis with genotypic classification of either:
  • Mutation in the UBE3A gene, and the pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant identified,
  • Deletion on the maternally inherited chromosome 15q11-q13 that encompasses the UBE3A gene.
  • Able to comply with all study requirements.
  • Able to tolerate blood draws.
  • Able to undergo LP and IT injection, under sedation or anesthesia without intubation as deemed appropriate.
  • Has stable medical status for at least 4 weeks prior to screening and at the time of enrolment.
  • Bodyweight > 7.5 kg
  • Legally authorized representative/caregiver(s) agree(s) not to share any of the participant's personal medical data or information related to the study by any means, including, e.g., a website or a post on a social media site (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, TikTok, etc.) from the time of enrollment until they are notified that the study is completed.
  • Stable permitted medications (including cannabidiol [CBD]) for epilepsy for 12 weeks prior to screening and at the time of enrolment, with the exception of age/weight-based or blood level (toxicity) dose adjustments.
  • Stable concurrent psychotropic medications for 4 weeks prior to screening and at time of enrolment.
  • Complies with the requirements regarding contraception and is confirmed by caregiver consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Molecular diagnosis of AS with genotypic classification of:
  • Uniparental paternal disomy (UPD) of 15q11-q13,
  • Imprinting center defect (ICD) within 15q11-q13,
  • A partial molecular diagnosis of AS, that cannot exclude UPD or ICD despite appropriate genetic testing.
  • Clinically significant vital signs or laboratory abnormalities during screening, including:
  • o Abnormal coagulation profile demonstrated by platelet count at or below lower limit of normal (140 × 109/L), or by abnormal international normalized ratio (INR) and/or prothrombin time (PT), or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT).
  • Presence of clinically relevant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities prior to dosing such as QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fredericia's formula (QTcF) > 460 ms, personal or family history of congenital long QT syndrome indicating safety risk in the Investigator's opinion. First-degree atrioventricular block or isolated right bundle branch block is allowed.
  • Clinically relevant disease or condition, including hematological, hepatic, cardiac or renal disease or abnormality, that would, in the judgement of the Investigator, pose an unacceptable risk to the participant or interfere with the conduct of the study
  • Any concomitant condition that might interfere with the clinical evaluation of AS and that is not related to AS.
  • Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, C, or E virus.
  • Any condition that increases the risk of meningitis.
  • History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.
  • Medical history of brain or spinal disease that would interfere with the LP process, CSF circulation or safety assessment, including:
  • Tumors or abnormalities detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT),
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage,
  • Clinical suggestion of raised intracranial pressure confirmed by MRI or ophthalmic examination,
  • Spinal stenosis or curvature (considered sufficient to prohibit LP),
  • Chiari malformation,
  • Hydrocephalus,
  • Syringomyelia,
  • Tethered spinal cord syndrome and connective tissue disorders such as Ehlers-Danos syndrome and Marfan syndrome,
  • Radiculopathy or radiculitis.
  • Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt for the drainage of CSF or an implanted CNS catheter.
  • Medical history of brain or spinal injury, of traumatic, hemorrhagic, or any other origin, that may result in symptoms interfering with AS.
  • History of clinically significant post LP headache of moderate or severe intensity and/or blood patch that would, in the judgement of the Investigator, pose an unacceptable risk to the participant or interfere with the conduct of the study.
  • Malignancy within 5 years of screening.
  • Hospitalization for any major medical or surgical procedure involving general anesthesia planned during the study, or within 4 weeks prior to screening, that - in the opinion of the Investigator - may pose a risk to the participant.
  • Prohibited use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy for 2 weeks prior to screening and at the time of enrolment.
  • Have any other conditions which would make the participant unsuitable for inclusion or could interfere with the participant participating in or completing the study, including any contraindication to administration of IT therapy.
  • Extremely or very preterm birth complications which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with study outcomes.
  • Birth complications, confirmed or suspected asphyxia before, during, or after birth.
  • Ascertained or presumptive hypersensitivity to the investigational medicinal product (IMP) or its excipients.
  • Participated in a clinical trial and received an IMP within 90 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) or tested an investigational medical device within 90 days prior to dosing or if the device is still active.
  • Concurrent or planned concurrent participation in any clinical study (including observational, non-drug and non-interventional studies) without a signed data sharing agreement in place between the other clinical study and the Sponsor.
  • Previous participation in cellular therapy, gene therapy, gene editing, or any other gene expression modulating clinical trial, such as an ASO treatment.

Study description and what participation involves

The study's detailed description, as published on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Detailed description from the registry

This study is a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, multi center study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrathecally (IT) administered rugonersen compared with sham in up to 165 participants with AS (Part 1), followed by an open-label extension (OLE) of approximately 116 weeks (2 years) for long-term evaluation of the efficacy and safety of IT administered rugonersen in participants with AS (Part 2).

AI summaryWhat participation may involve, in plain languageShow ▾Hide ▴

AI-written from the registry record, not the study's own wording. May contain errors or omissions. Check the registry text on this page and the original record ↗ before acting on it.

Participants are randomized to receive intrathecal rugonersen or a sham procedure. The rugonersen arm involves a lumbar puncture/intrathecal injection under sedation or anesthesia (without intubation as appropriate); the registry does not specify whether the sham arm includes an actual lumbar puncture. Visits include developmental testing (Bayley-4), EEG recordings, regular safety monitoring and blood draws, and caregiver questionnaires/assessments. The blinded treatment period includes evaluations through about Week 56, followed by an open-label extension of approximately 116 weeks for longer-term safety and efficacy follow-up. Caregivers must attend visits, be available to the study team, and follow study privacy and medication-stability requirements.

How the study is structured. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either intrathecal rugonersen or a sham procedure. The study is double-blind and quadruple-masked (participants, care providers, investigators, and outcomes assessors do not know assignment). Primary assessments occur through week 56; participants may enter an open-label extension of about 116 weeks for long-term evaluation.

Questions you could ask

These questions are suggestions for a conversation with the study team or your own clinician, not advice.

  • The listed sites are in United States. Is any of them reachable for me, and does the study help with travel?
  • Which of the eligibility criteria would need to be checked with tests before I could join?

More on Angelman syndrome

Important dates

Study start
Jun 23, 2026
Primary completion
March 2029 (estimated)
Study completion
March 2031 (estimated)
Target enrollment
165 participants (estimated)
Last updated on registry
Sep 10, 2026
Data verified
Oct 10, 2026

Sponsor and research team

The lead sponsor funds and oversees the trial. A pharmaceutical or biotech company sponsor typically means the study is testing that company's drug or device; a hospital, university, or government agency usually indicates investigator-initiated or publicly funded research.

Lead sponsor
OHB Pediatrics Ltd.
Collaborators
  • Medpace, Inc.

Central study contact

If you're interested in participating, the central contact can answer general questions about the study — including eligibility requirements and how to find a recruiting site near you. Actual eligibility is determined by the site's medical team.

Participating sites (3)

  • Rady Children's HospitalRecruiting

    San Diego, California, 92123 · United States

    • Lynne Bird
  • Rush UniversityRecruiting

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612 · United States

    • Elizabeth Berry-Kravis
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of MedicineRecruiting

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27510 · United States

    • Elizabeth Jalazo

Terms used on this page · explanations by MedicalUpdates.ai

intrathecally
Given by injection into the fluid around the spinal cord, usually through a lumbar puncture.
informed consent form
The process of explaining a study, including its risks and what participation involves, so that a person can decide freely whether to take part. Consent is usually documented in writing, and a participant can choose to leave the study later.
legal representative
A person who is legally allowed to make decisions, including consent to research, on behalf of someone who cannot consent for themselves.
investigational
A treatment that is being tested and has not been approved for this use. It may be approved for a different condition. Being studied does not mean it works or is available outside the study.
prior to screening
The checks done before enrolment to see whether a person qualifies, such as tests, scans or a review of medical history.
enrolment
The number of participants a study plans to include, or has included. 'Estimated' means the planned number; 'actual' means the number who joined.
electrocardiogram
A recording of the heart's electrical activity. QTc is one measurement from it; some drugs are avoided if it is prolonged.
magnetic resonance imaging
A scan that uses magnets and radio waves, not X-rays, to make detailed pictures of the inside of the body. Some implants and metal objects mean a person cannot have one.
computed tomography
An X-ray scan that builds detailed cross-section images of the body. 'High-resolution' CT (HRCT) is used to look closely at the lungs.
contraindication
A reason a particular test or treatment should not be used for a person, for example a metal implant that rules out an MRI scan.
5 half-lives
The time it takes for the amount of a drug in the body to fall by half. 'Five half-lives' is often used as the point at which a previous drug has essentially left the body.
observational
A study in which researchers do not assign participants to a treatment or other intervention. They observe or measure what happens, which may include study visits, tests, questionnaires or a review of medical records.
Sponsor
The organisation or person that initiates the study and has authority over it. The sponsor may be a company, hospital, university, government agency or individual, and is not necessarily the organisation that funds the study.
Inclusion Criteria
The conditions a person must meet to be considered for the study, for example a confirmed diagnosis, an age range or a test result.
Exclusion Criteria
The conditions that rule a person out even if they meet the inclusion criteria, for example other illnesses, certain medicines or pregnancy.
randomized
Participants are assigned to the study groups by chance, like a coin toss, rather than chosen by the doctor or the participant. This is done so the groups are comparable.
double-blind
Two types of people involved in the study do not know which intervention a participant is receiving. The ClinicalTrials.gov record specifies who is masked, for example participants, care providers, investigators or outcome assessors.
sham
A procedure designed to resemble the real procedure, for example the same visit and equipment, without its active part. It is the procedure equivalent of a placebo.
open-label extension
A continuation study in which participants who completed an earlier study can keep receiving the treatment, usually with everyone knowing what they are given.

The study record on this page is reproduced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, where it was submitted by the study sponsor. MedicalUpdates.ai does not own this content, is not affiliated with or endorsed by ClinicalTrials.gov, NIH, or the U.S. Government, and does not verify the record. Plain-language notes, the glossary and the questions above are added by this site; text in the boxes marked "AI summary" was written by an AI model and may contain errors. Registry records change over time. Check the original record for the current version and discuss eligibility or participation with a qualified healthcare professional.

← Back to clinical trials